[citation][nom]g-thor[/nom]Standard lawsuit practice - actual cost of damages plus punitive charges. It happens to big companies when they get busted for breaking the laws (really - especially workplace safety). Say you sued MPAA because they caused you to have panic attacks. Would you settle for them just paying your wages for the time you lost at work, or would you expect to get punitive charges to make them think twice about causing panic attacks for other people (caused by launching large lawsuits against movie pirates).I have to agree with most people on this, though - it won't stop piracy. Many people justify stealing music and videos, but if they snuck into a theatre without a ticket and got busted, would they try and use the same justification. I think MPAA and RIAA need to write pirates off as "We wouldn't have gotten any money from these people if we only charged a nickel" and walk away from it.Most of us are honest. If we think the movie or the music is worth having, we'll pay for it. It makes me wonder if the top dogs of MPAA/RIAA can actually think that way, or do their minds not work like that. They also fail to see that we simply want to listen to/watch our purchases on whatever device we have - DVD player, computer, Zune/iThing or smartphone (really?). Let us do that and forget the rest. Reward us who support you and don't treat us as if we're your enemy.[/citation]
Based on this you should pay punitive damage in 1$ range as it should be based on your income and if company with 250bil income usually pays much less then 1%.
How hard is really punitive damage of 5milion for someone that makes billions from it.
Based on this you should pay punitive damage in 1$ range as it should be based on your income and if company with 250bil income usually pays much less then 1%.
How hard is really punitive damage of 5milion for someone that makes billions from it.