About to buy, so need comparisons/recommendations/experien..

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

My budget is about $600Cdn, and I want a small-medium size non-SLR. Based on
specs and reviews I've narrowed it down to 4 choices that seem to break into
2 comparable pairs :

Compact = Canon A95 & S60
Pocket = Canon SD3000 & Sony DSC P200

Anyone have any comments or experiences to share? Each camera is different
from the others - makes it a hard choice. For me, smaller is better so it's
always around, but I still want power and quality shots.

TIA - R.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

R,

I have been using the Canon S35, the older brother of the S60, and have
been extremely happy with it. I bought it for its small size and
pocketability (is that a word?). It takes wonderful pictures and has a
good number of manual controls for those so inclined.

Here are some Hawaii photos I took with the S35, if interested:
http/kerekesphotos.com/kp-gallery-public.shtml

Charlie

Got digital photos? Show them off!
http/FlyingSamPhoto.com

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Have a look at www.dpreview.com you can do a side by side comparison.



"R." <rob.fisher@ourden.ca> wrote in message
news:hv0ce.1147045$8l.84357@pd7tw1no...
> My budget is about $600Cdn, and I want a small-medium size non-SLR. Based
> on specs and reviews I've narrowed it down to 4 choices that seem to break
> into 2 comparable pairs :
>
> Compact = Canon A95 & S60
> Pocket = Canon SD3000 & Sony DSC P200
>
> Anyone have any comments or experiences to share? Each camera is different
> from the others - makes it a hard choice. For me, smaller is better so
> it's always around, but I still want power and quality shots.
>
> TIA - R.
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

R. wrote:
> My budget is about $600Cdn, and I want a small-medium size non-SLR. Based on
> specs and reviews I've narrowed it down to 4 choices that seem to break into
> 2 comparable pairs :
>
> Compact = Canon A95 & S60
> Pocket = Canon SD3000 & Sony DSC P200
>
> Anyone have any comments or experiences to share? Each camera is different
> from the others - makes it a hard choice. For me, smaller is better so it's
> always around, but I still want power and quality shots.
>
> TIA - R.
>
>
I have never used one, but the Canon A95 seems to have a lot of support
here as a good performer.
Even better, you should be able to find it for a discounted price since
it is part of the 'old line'.


--
Ron Hunter rphunter@charter.net

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

R. wrote:
> My budget is about $600Cdn, and I want a small-medium size non-SLR. Based on
> specs and reviews I've narrowed it down to 4 choices that seem to break into
> 2 comparable pairs :
>
> Compact = Canon A95 & S60
> Pocket = Canon SD3000 & Sony DSC P200
>

I've just bought a CASIO exilim P700 and I'm quite enthusiastic about it.
Have a look at http/exilim.casio.com/
I've seen it for less than 400 US $ or 320 Euros in Europe


Helmut Jarausch
Aachen, Germany

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"Pete D" <no@email.com> wrote in message
news:mh1ce.31826$5F3.2063@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Have a look at www.dpreview.com you can do a side by side comparison.

And www.epinions.com can have good content as well.

Dave