AGAIN, please critique

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Hi all...

I took heed to all of the great info that I was given last week,
especially about my large gallery full of "cruft" wasting everyone's
time. I spent the weekend reading up on photo editing and have been
working non-stop ever since. (My husband may commit me as he
should...it is 4:00 AM my time and I have done little else!!!)

I have 16 photos in my gallery that I think are much better. Even my
favorites turned out better with a little tweeking.

I would appreciate it if you guys could look at my much smaller gallery
and give me the same brutal honesty as last time - yes, I am a glutton
for punishment!! I think I have improved given the good critiques that
I received last time. I can only get better, right?

http/www.pbase.com/crazylikedat/galleries

Again, thanks to Larry, Marvin, Bob, Derek, News Guy Mike, Sheldon,
Frank, Ben, Krystian and Rudy for all the great advice.

Tanya

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On 8 Mar 2005 02:11:16 -0800, "crazylikedat" <belatrix001@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Hi all...
>
>I took heed to all of the great info that I was given last week,
>especially about my large gallery full of "cruft" wasting everyone's
>time. I spent the weekend reading up on photo editing and have been
>working non-stop ever since. (My husband may commit me as he
>should...it is 4:00 AM my time and I have done little else!!!)
>
>I have 16 photos in my gallery that I think are much better. Even my
>favorites turned out better with a little tweeking.
>
>I would appreciate it if you guys could look at my much smaller gallery
>and give me the same brutal honesty as last time - yes, I am a glutton
>for punishment!! I think I have improved given the good critiques that
>I received last time. I can only get better, right?
>
>http/www.pbase.com/crazylikedat/galleries
>
>Again, thanks to Larry, Marvin, Bob, Derek, News Guy Mike, Sheldon,
>Frank, Ben, Krystian and Rudy for all the great advice.
>
>Tanya

The only comment I'll make is this:
If you're going to present a gallery for critique, don't open the
gallery with a pic such as DSC_0234. It's so fuzzy that it hurts, and
it gives a very bad first impression.

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

 

[Beano]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Unimaginative subject matter and framing throughout. Extremely average,
almost pedestrian, I'd say.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

In article <1110276676.145193.114850@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
belatrix001@yahoo.com says...
> Hi all...
>
> I took heed to all of the great info that I was given last week,
> especially about my large gallery full of "cruft" wasting everyone's
> time. I spent the weekend reading up on photo editing and have been
> working non-stop ever since. (My husband may commit me as he
> should...it is 4:00 AM my time and I have done little else!!!)
>
> I have 16 photos in my gallery that I think are much better. Even my
> favorites turned out better with a little tweeking.
>
> I would appreciate it if you guys could look at my much smaller gallery
> and give me the same brutal honesty as last time - yes, I am a glutton
> for punishment!! I think I have improved given the good critiques that
> I received last time. I can only get better, right?
>
> http/www.pbase.com/crazylikedat/galleries
>
> Again, thanks to Larry, Marvin, Bob, Derek, News Guy Mike, Sheldon,
> Frank, Ben, Krystian and Rudy for all the great advice.
>
> Tanya
>
>
Other than the fact that a couple are out of focus, I think they're all
great. Ignore any comments from idiots (Beano, for instance...let's see
his pictures...).

Anyway, nice work...

Drude

 

[Larry]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

In article <MPG.1c9770351d492a4a9896a7@shawnews>, brude@shaw.com says...
> In article <1110276676.145193.114850@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
> belatrix001@yahoo.com says...
> > Hi all...
> >
> > I took heed to all of the great info that I was given last week,
> > especially about my large gallery full of "cruft" wasting everyone's
> > time. I spent the weekend reading up on photo editing and have been
> > working non-stop ever since. (My husband may commit me as he
> > should...it is 4:00 AM my time and I have done little else!!!)
> >
> > I have 16 photos in my gallery that I think are much better. Even my
> > favorites turned out better with a little tweeking.
> >
> > I would appreciate it if you guys could look at my much smaller gallery
> > and give me the same brutal honesty as last time - yes, I am a glutton
> > for punishment!! I think I have improved given the good critiques that
> > I received last time. I can only get better, right?
> >
> > http/www.pbase.com/crazylikedat/galleries
> >
> > Again, thanks to Larry, Marvin, Bob, Derek, News Guy Mike, Sheldon,
> > Frank, Ben, Krystian and Rudy for all the great advice.
> >
> > Tanya
> >
> >
> Other than the fact that a couple are out of focus, I think they're all
> great. Ignore any comments from idiots (Beano, for instance...let's see
> his pictures...).
>
> Anyway, nice work...
>
> Drude
>

Loved the BARN (00400) It looks like a calendar shot to me..

As before, the shots could be a little brighter, but they only need a TOUCH,
not a slam.


--
Larry Lynch
Mystic, Ct.