Archived from groups: microsoft.public.pocketpc (
More info?)
I use Agenda Fusion and really like it (I keep upgrading the thing gladly).
My color scheme is pretty close to the standard PPC color scheme, so it
doesn't bother me. As long as one can view the data and the colors are not
so bad they can give you a headache, what's more important, functionality or
colors?
Jim
"Fanatic GPS User" <gps_user@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:he6f70dhn2ag8nvfhdiqc3ispvrteapv4l@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 17:12:18 -0400, "someone@somewhere.com"
> <someone@microsoft,com> wrote:
>
> >They are essentially the same... I am in the same boat as you right
now... I
> >have been using both for a week now and personally, even though PI looks
> >better imho Fusion is more functional for certain things that I need it
to
> >do, but it is horrible as far as colour schemes
>
> I do agree, Fusion looks like a circus with lots of colors ..
>
> Best regards (gps_user@hotmail.com)
> 51°02'09.72" N 3°44'26.04" (WGS 84)
> iPaq 5455 owner and User
> Compaq PCMCIA Double Expansion Sleeve
> Resco File explorer
> Tom Tom Europe & GPSAssist
> .. and lots more
>
> >"Fanatic GPS User" <gps_user@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:qouc7052vj3d6grclmt4rt9idv38qpglp5@4ax.com...
> >> I am in for a very difficult decisions. What to choose : Agenda Fusion
> >> 6.0 or Pocket Informant 5.0 ? Both look very neat but what are their
> >> essential differences ?
> >>
> >> Any help would be appreciated.
>
>