Archived from groups: comp.sys.cbm,alt.c64,rec.games.video.classic (
More info?)
Just one problem.
The hardware to the PC works just as fine as the Amiga hardware. The problem
is that you can buy loads of different hardware made by load of different
companies. That wasn't the case when we talked about the Amiga or the
C64/128 or what ever.
Imagine how well your PC would work if it was only one company who made the
computer and the hardware(like the commodore company). Then Microsoft would
have better luck trying to make their software to the computer.
-Freeloader
"jhdf" <fgh@fghf.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:ia-dnZkBotjmE-HfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
> I disagree. Simply for the fact that all hardware made for the machines
> worked flawlessly, without outsourcing and 5th party drivers that do not
> work.
>
> Hell many hardware componenets for windows machines are adapted from
> windows/dos... IE, network cards.
>
> The rest of the support is fluff. At least Amigas was hardware specific
> drivers. The same type of logic with the Macs. No retards programming
> drivers for an unknown system.
>
> XP, more reliable. Sure, in and of itself its fine. But an Amiga could
deal
> with 100% of the hardware made for it. Can the same be said about XP?
>
> Cyberjank
> Call mad world bbs ---------- madworld.bounceme.net
>
>
>
> "Clockmeister" <no-one@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:427bbcbb$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> >
> > "ElectroPig" <anon@home.net> wrote in message
> > news:d5fuc20qhq@enews3.newsguy.com...
> >>
> >> "Robert Bernardo" <rbernardo@iglou.com> wrote in message
> >> news

ine.GSO.4.61.0505060430300.3224@shell1...
> >> > Earlier in the year it was reported that Jeri Ellsworth would hold a
C1
> >> > developer's mini-conference at the late May AmigaEast Show.
AmigaEast
> > has
> >> been
> >> > cancelled! The organizer cites financial problems.
> >>
> >> Hahaha...now there's a shocker...after Amiga/CBM/ESCOM so far, why
> >> would
> >> we expect there to be a solid company behind the AMiga at this point?!
> > d:^|
> >>
> >> Too bad...even the machines from the mid 80's are still more reliable
> > than
> >> "allegedly modern" Windoze machines...
> >
> > No they're not, XP is more reliable then any of my Amigas ever were.
> >
> >
>
>