Android's Andy Rubin Slaps Down Apple's New Siri

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
"Worked well"? I think not. My Android voice command feature is laughable. After hearing the Head Droid say something as stupid as this, I'm seriously thinking of trading in my Droid smartphone for an Apple product that might possibly understand it when I talk to it.

And yes, I do want a cybernetic assistant, one I don't need a thick manual for and don't need to push ten tiny buttons to get it to do what I want. I want the Enterprise's computer...in my hand.
 
[citation][nom]tgreader[/nom]Neither did Apple, they bought the SIRI company.[/citation]

OK so maybe he's pissed that he didn't think to buy it.
 
When your product lacks a feature that your competitor offers, you badmouth the feature. It's a lot cheaper than developing something to compete with it.
 
Anyone remember Motorola's voice controlled digital assistant Mya (2000)? I'm sure Apple will sue Motorola now that they have reinvented the wheel again.
 
[citation][nom]SirGCal[/nom]How about paying attention to the @#$%ing road instead of your phone when behind the wheel. That's the biggest problem today is people are too 'preoccupied' to properly operate a vehicle. Which is why auto accidents are one of the highest causes of death... Phones and all they distract us with contribute to that effect... Honestly, they should make an interruption system to block phone use in a moving vehicle... Hands-free voice calls only...Ya, ya'll sit there and say 'pisha'... But when you're burring your own mother or best friend, as I have, due to someone who was 'on the phone... bla bla bla'... Only then, when it's too late, will you understand...As for SIRI, Android has Vlingo... I've used both and see very little differences other than SIRI has caused me more problems with it trying to 'guess' what I want it really to do. Some people say SIRI has Vlingo beat and I do not understand this argument... So the software (which is now owned by a company publicly known for tracking user information... so...) tries to guess what you really meant. Though personally I don't like it over trigger-word type commands so you 'know' what it's going to do instead of hoping or assuming, it won't be long before others (Vlingo) follow suit with the more generic phrase recognition. SIRI's biggest problem is Apple bought them and now the Android version is canceled... Honestly, this is a huge money loss and even possibly a total app killer in the end. If they at least had a port to Android, then they could make the sales from those devices also as well as increase their market-share instead of just the lower-market-share iOS devices anyhow. Especially for $200 million?!? You want to make that $ back, not potentially lose it cause you locked a product down to your own greed-filled products...Sure, buying SIRI might have been a good move for Apple, but not locking it down... Plus, now that gives the competition like Vlingo, who will most likely catch up and/or surpass in due time, an edge with greater market-share with combined Android, iOS, Berry and Win support. In the end, if they don't change their ways, it'll be just another failure in the Apple history book...[/citation]

1 - Siri removes the need to look at the screen whilst driving, much like hands-free sets, which have been shown to massively increase safety. People will try to text when they're driving regardless, this gives them a better way to do that. Just like you can talk to people in your car whilst driving. Do you want to ban that too?

2 - Siri may have been worth a lot more had they not sold to Apple, but surely that means Apple got excellent value for money? An excellent strategic decision, too, given that now it can't be used on Android. Protecting their users from a similar move from other companies.

3 - Vlingo is not the equivalent of Siri:

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/cell-phones/siri-understands-intent-beats-google-voice-actions-tellme-and-vlingo/6780
http://www.pcworld.com/article/242198/apples_siri_vs_androids_voice_actions_feature_showdown.html

Pretty much unanimous over the internet that Siri is far more advanced.

As for claims that the phone will 'catch up' in the future, surely that's proof that Apple is leading the way on this one.. you can't catch someone up if you're already level with them.
 
'' What he failed to point out is that millions of people talk to their friends and family through a bluetooth earpiece which, to be honest, makes them look like asylum escapees talking to their invisible friends.'' COme on!!! what a lame comment.!! People on the Bluetooth make sense when they are talking, not people saying ''menu'' or ''open itunes'' or '' go to www.tomshardware.com'' it's so much faster to think and type those commands. i Think the talk commands will never catch. Maybe if apple creates a mind reader it would be nice.
 
Well, I actually like the idea of telling my phone when to wake me up, and to remind me of things easily. Its much easier than going through a bunch of menus to set an alarm or phoning a secretary to mark things on a notebook. Yeah, phones are for communicating, but right now theyre all for much more. Dude sounds like a troll.
 
[citation][nom]watcha[/nom]1 - Siri removes the need to look at the screen whilst driving, much like hands-free sets, which have been shown to massively increase safety. People will try to text when they're driving regardless, this gives them a better way to do that. Just like you can talk to people in your car whilst driving. Do you want to ban that too?[/citation]
Really, could you please show a study showing this?

I have read studies which show that talking to someone in a car is much safer than talking to somebody who is not in a car and that hands free really does very little to improve the situation. All hands free does is give you a second hand, and seeing that other than when I need to shift, I rarely use my second hand.

The problem with phones is, they're a distraction from what's going on. Having hands free doesn't fix this. As the roughly 4 people on my drive home from work every day demonstrate as I'm holding myself back from going up to their car at a stoplight, telling the person they're chatting with that "I'm sorry, but this person is too stupid to operate a vehicle and talk at the same time." and hanging up the phone.
 
[citation][nom]mayne92[/nom]NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That can't be!! Apple is the most innovative company in the universe! Siri had to come from Jobs' brain![/citation]

And now that he has passed away they keep his brain connected to some system that Steve also invented to keep milking it of ideas...

With that said, I think the consensus is that this guys response is overall ignorant. I'm up for a contract renewal (using a 3Gs) and was thinking about going Android this time. Siri and the hardware muscle of the new 4s are two reasons why I can't make up my mind. That and there is a new Android every 3 weeks. I waited months for the GSII and now it's the Galaxy Nexus. By the time that comes out something Tegra 3 will be on the horizon. BOOM. My head just exploded. This guy needs to stop making dumb comments and start creating an Android voice-control friend and make it better than Apple.
 
[citation][nom]dark_knight33[/nom]Jealous much? Android has similar capability, but Apple is doing what Apple does best -- marketing it better. Its unprofessional, and extremely telling that the best Andy can come up with is to bash Siri instead of pointing out how Android users have had this capability, and didn't know it, or just don't use it (i.e. Vlingo).[/citation]

Android currently has nothing like Siri. Would you droid heads get over your insecurities and realize android voice control and apple's first release of an AI tech are different things.
 
.i think he is pissed that he didn't come up with voice control first
..
Sorry but... some people was mislead.
It's not the first time I hear something like this... but Siri wasn't the first of this kind.
Google have massively investing in voice system called "Google Market".
It's do the same and better than Siri, one year before Siri come out.
So Apple didn't invent anything there. Please.

At this point it's just marketing.
It's sure technicly... you should speak to someone human but talk to a phone bring curiosity. Apple follow by army of fanbois have everything for make Siri a success.
The success of Siri is based on fanbois and new fanbois wannabe.
 
The last time I checked Rubin was a sandwich, so why is this guy named after a sandwich? Sandwiches should not be talking for me!
 
[citation][nom]back_by_demand[/nom]Maybe he saw it for what it was, douchbaggery of an epic kind[/citation]

LOL, it's now 'douchbaggery' for a technology to invest in technology companies?

Riiiiight.

To the rest of the world, it's just logical business sense.
 
[citation][nom]cyprod[/nom]Really, could you please show a study showing this?I have read studies which show that talking to someone in a car is much safer than talking to somebody who is not in a car and that hands free really does very little to improve the situation. All hands free does is give you a second hand, and seeing that other than when I need to shift, I rarely use my second hand.The problem with phones is, they're a distraction from what's going on. Having hands free doesn't fix this. As the roughly 4 people on my drive home from work every day demonstrate as I'm holding myself back from going up to their car at a stoplight, telling the person they're chatting with that "I'm sorry, but this person is too stupid to operate a vehicle and talk at the same time." and hanging up the phone.[/citation]

Actually - it looks like you're right on this one. There's very small scale experiments which say that it's just as bad to use handsfree and talk on the phone, and nothing large which shows any reduced risk.

I guess Siri 'on-the-move' becomes reduced to less dangerous situations like running, where there is less danger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.