Any digital FTA feeds not listed on Lyngsat?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

Every so often I see something that leads me to believe there is digital
programming on the North American satellites that is not listed with
Lyngsat for one reason or another. I'm wondering if these feeds are listed
anywhere, or even if anyone would be willing to send me their personal
list. I am particularly interested in FTA feeds that are legal to view, in
English, and on C or Ku-band satellites visible from North America. I'm
using a Pansat 2500A with the original factory firmware.

If you don't want to post a list to the newsgroup but would be willing to
send it privately, please send it to the following address, but first
please remove the 2 instances of the number 2: bird2watcher [AT]
thebig82.net (also please don't get spooked by the address, that is a
personal e-mail address and I do not work for or otherwise provide any
information to any broadcasters or other media people - anything you send
will be used only for my personal use, and if you send any MLB feeds, those
would be used to tune in games for my elderly mother who loves to watch
baseball. And remember, there are no number 2's in the real e-mail
address).

Thanks in advance to anyone who can help!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:38:00 -0400, see-message-body@to-email.us
wrote:

>Every so often I see something that leads me to believe there is digital
>programming on the North American satellites that is not listed with
>Lyngsat for one reason or another. I'm wondering if these feeds are listed
>anywhere, or even if anyone would be willing to send me their personal
>list. I am particularly interested in FTA feeds that are legal to view, in
>English, and on C or Ku-band satellites visible from North America. I'm
>using a Pansat 2500A with the original factory firmware.
>

You can find them yourself with the 2500, it's the best way.
You should join the wildfeed mailing lists as well, maybe someone will
post the links as I have lost them in a computer crash.




>If you don't want to post a list to the newsgroup but would be willing to
>send it privately, please send it to the following address, but first
>please remove the 2 instances of the number 2: bird2watcher [AT]
>thebig82.net (also please don't get spooked by the address, that is a
>personal e-mail address and I do not work for or otherwise provide any
>information to any broadcasters or other media people - anything you send
>will be used only for my personal use, and if you send any MLB feeds, those
>would be used to tune in games for my elderly mother who loves to watch
>baseball. And remember, there are no number 2's in the real e-mail
>address).


Post em! I've never understood why everyone thinks the programmers are
too dumb to turn on the encryption...

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

see-message-body@to-email.us wrote:
> Every so often I see something that leads me to believe there is digital
> programming on the North American satellites that is not listed with
> Lyngsat for one reason or another. I'm wondering if these feeds are listed
> anywhere, or even if anyone would be willing to send me their personal
> list. I am particularly interested in FTA feeds that are legal to view, in
> English, and on C or Ku-band satellites visible from North America. I'm
> using a Pansat 2500A with the original factory firmware.
>
> If you don't want to post a list to the newsgroup but would be willing to
> send it privately, please send it to the following address, but first
> please remove the 2 instances of the number 2: bird2watcher [AT]
> thebig82.net (also please don't get spooked by the address, that is a
> personal e-mail address and I do not work for or otherwise provide any
> information to any broadcasters or other media people - anything you send
> will be used only for my personal use, and if you send any MLB feeds, those
> would be used to tune in games for my elderly mother who loves to watch
> baseball. And remember, there are no number 2's in the real e-mail
> address).
>
> Thanks in advance to anyone who can help!


Intelsat 6 KU frequently has feed video for local news crews around the
country. If you have a blind search receiver do searches any time there
might be local news airing around the country - in the mornings, around
noon, between 4 & 7 and 9 to 11 pm (all time zones).

Yahoogroups has an email group (MPEGbackhauls) that will email backhaul
feed info of sporting and other special events to you as it's happening.

Take care,
Rich

God bless the USA

--
Mathematical fact: 50% of people have below average intelligence.

- P. J. O'Rourke

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

Well one thing is for sure, noone is going to send you a personal
email with that spam block. You have the best receiver for finding
hidden feeds. Use your Pansat 2500's smart search to find them.
Seriously though, almost everything is listed on lyngsat, satcodx or
satforums already.
Mike

see-message-body@to-email.us wrote:
>
> Every so often I see something that leads me to believe there is digital
> programming on the North American satellites that is not listed with
> Lyngsat for one reason or another. I'm wondering if these feeds are listed
> anywhere, or even if anyone would be willing to send me their personal
> list. I am particularly interested in FTA feeds that are legal to view, in
> English, and on C or Ku-band satellites visible from North America. I'm
> using a Pansat 2500A with the original factory firmware.
>
> If you don't want to post a list to the newsgroup but would be willing to
> send it privately, please send it to the following address, but first
> please remove the 2 instances of the number 2: bird2watcher [AT]
> thebig82.net (also please don't get spooked by the address, that is a
> personal e-mail address and I do not work for or otherwise provide any
> information to any broadcasters or other media people - anything you send
> will be used only for my personal use, and if you send any MLB feeds, those
> would be used to tune in games for my elderly mother who loves to watch
> baseball. And remember, there are no number 2's in the real e-mail
> address).
>
> Thanks in advance to anyone who can help!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:21:19 -0500, Rich Piehl
<rpiehl5REMOVETHIS@FORNOSPAMcharter.net> wrote:

>Mathematical fact: 50% of people have below average intelligence.
>
> - P. J. O'Rourke

Wrong, 100% of speaking people have above average intelligence when
compared to a guerilla.

Relative to what is the question? Rourke is a dork!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:23:09 GMT, "steelblu<E>"@neo.rr.com wrote:

>Well one thing is for sure, noone is going to send you a personal
>email with that spam block. You have the best receiver for finding
>hidden feeds. Use your Pansat 2500's smart search to find them.
>Seriously though, almost everything is listed on lyngsat, satcodx or
>satforums already.
>Mike

bAHHH, bs.

I am seriously considering a LS like site with current and real info
regarding all known DVB FTA and DCII feeds.
The need is these.



>
>see-message-body@to-email.us wrote:
>>
>> Every so often I see something that leads me to believe there is digital
>> programming on the North American satellites that is not listed with
>> Lyngsat for one reason or another. I'm wondering if these feeds are listed
>> anywhere, or even if anyone would be willing to send me their personal
>> list. I am particularly interested in FTA feeds that are legal to view, in
>> English, and on C or Ku-band satellites visible from North America. I'm
>> using a Pansat 2500A with the original factory firmware.
>>
>> If you don't want to post a list to the newsgroup but would be willing to
>> send it privately, please send it to the following address, but first
>> please remove the 2 instances of the number 2: bird2watcher [AT]
>> thebig82.net (also please don't get spooked by the address, that is a
>> personal e-mail address and I do not work for or otherwise provide any
>> information to any broadcasters or other media people - anything you send
>> will be used only for my personal use, and if you send any MLB feeds, those
>> would be used to tune in games for my elderly mother who loves to watch
>> baseball. And remember, there are no number 2's in the real e-mail
>> address).
>>
>> Thanks in advance to anyone who can help!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

<My_Thoughts@useenet.com> wrote in message news:t9fog09urbes057qqamjk93c6s9opjjjid@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 09:21:19 -0500, Rich Piehl
> <rpiehl5REMOVETHIS@FORNOSPAMcharter.net> wrote:
>
> >Mathematical fact: 50% of people have below average intelligence.
> >
> > - P. J. O'Rourke
>
> Wrong, 100% of speaking people have above average intelligence when
> compared to a guerilla.

So, guerillas are people too...is that what your saying?

> Relative to what is the question? Rourke is a dork!

Half the people in the world are above average in
their dorkiness. As evidenced.




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http/www.usenet.com

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb (More info?)

Wrong, 100% of speaking people have above average intelligence when
compared to a >guerilla<.



"Gorilla" like in monkey?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb (More info?)

Consider the following group of people:

Name IQ
Joe 60
Bill 180
Sue 180
Jen 180

Average intelligence: (60+180+180+180)/4 = 600/4 = 150

Looks like more than half have above average intelligence in this example.

Greg O.


"PieCheech" <piecheech@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040802220208.11752.00002654@mb-m11.aol.com...
> Wrong, 100% of speaking people have above average intelligence when
> compared to a >guerilla<.
>
>
>
> "Gorilla" like in monkey?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 16:23:09 GMT, "steelblu<E>"@neo.rr.com wrote:

>Well one thing is for sure, noone is going to send you a personal
>email with that spam block. You have the best receiver for finding
>hidden feeds. Use your Pansat 2500's smart search to find them.
>Seriously though, almost everything is listed on lyngsat, satcodx or
>satforums already.
>Mike
>
>see-message-body@to-email.us wrote:
>>
>> Every so often I see something that leads me to believe there is digital
>> programming on the North American satellites that is not listed with
>> Lyngsat for one reason or another. I'm wondering if these feeds are listed
>> anywhere, or even if anyone would be willing to send me their personal
>> list. I am particularly interested in FTA feeds that are legal to view, in
>> English, and on C or Ku-band satellites visible from North America. I'm
>> using a Pansat 2500A with the original factory firmware.
>>
>> If you don't want to post a list to the newsgroup but would be willing to
>> send it privately, please send it to the following address, but first
>> please remove the 2 instances of the number 2: bird2watcher [AT]
>> thebig82.net (also please don't get spooked by the address, that is a
>> personal e-mail address and I do not work for or otherwise provide any
>> information to any broadcasters or other media people - anything you send
>> will be used only for my personal use, and if you send any MLB feeds, those
>> would be used to tune in games for my elderly mother who loves to watch
>> baseball. And remember, there are no number 2's in the real e-mail
>> address).
>>
>> Thanks in advance to anyone who can help!

If you had read my original message carefully, you would have found a
useable e-mail address in there. Those who feel it's beneath them to
un-mung an e-mail address must have all the time in the world to deal with
spam, but I don't. Anyway, I'd much rather see replies posted to the group
to begin with, but I got the feeling that some people think that if they
post feeds to the group they will disappear, which is the only reason I
even made the attempt to give an e-mail address in the first place.

So, if you feel you can't post to the group, and you can't reply to me
privately unless I give you an e-mail address in a form that would be easy
pickings for every automated spam harvester out there, then have a nice
life - I'll get by without the information somehow.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:01:44 -0400, john wilson <jwilson9@erols.com>
wrote:

> The answer is "Yes". Only irresponsible individuals post to
>Lyngsat thereby announcing to the world a "new" FTA service and
>increasing the risk of uplinker encryption. The word eventually gets
>back to the uplinker and sooner or later thereafter it is uncrypted or
>removed from that satellite. Last year I discovered Fox News being
>transmitted on an AOR satellite. I discovered Montana PBS and watched
>it months before it unfortunately was posted on Lyngsat. Most
>interested individuals are too lazy to spend the necessary money for a
>good FTA search receiver or spend the timing required to search
>whatever. In the past I have shared info with a few trusted people but
>I was not stupid and posted anything in a newsgroup on Lyngsat. I share
>the Fox News info now because that feed no longer exists. Lyngsat
>depends upon voluntary viewing contributions. Some listings are
>correct. Some are incorrect and some are not listed. With some
>exceptions many of these contributors have technically inferior
>reception systems. For over 5 years I have maintained my own MPEG2 FTA
>C/Ku band database in MS EXCEL. I have one 12 ft. Prodelin reflector
>dedicated to viewing the AOR Arc and the other for the US Domestic. The
>lnb voltage is controlled separately using variable DC power, power
>divider, a DBOX to confirm reception and id FECs and a Pansat 2500. The
>lnbs are switch selectable to either a C or Ku band wide band lnb. I
>recently finished checking the AOR arc and I will not be posting my
>finds on Lyngsat or any user group. Probably next month I will survey
>the US Domestic arc.


I honestly don't buy this. Soon I will have the capacity of blind
scanning every sat from 137w to 22W automatically and logging it
directly to my fancy database. I have been considering putting up the
info on a much needed site., I have a 12ft Paraclipse with an H2H
connected to a Vbox2 for this project.

How long did the porn last on T7? Everyone and their brother knew for
a year.

Most times these feeds are temporary as EVERYONE damn well knows, and
the operators of this equipment are not so dumb as to forget to turn
on the encryption.
I have always felt the owners only section of 4dtv was bunk, and I
think keeping feeds secret is bunk. How come none of the analog stuff
went VC2+ for the last twenty years?

Someone needs to make alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb.wildfeeds

Perhaps I will do it to avoid making a stupid site. Maybe I will just
post here.

I suppose I should finish simulating the commands needed through the
UHF port and get this party started.

Thanks for reminding me just why I thought of this in the first place!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

john wilson <jwilson9@erols.com> wrote in news:41310ED8.9090406@erols.com:

> I discovered Montana PBS and watched
> it months before it unfortunately was posted on Lyngsat.

=========

Montana PBS is still there. I watch it all the time. It is on AMC3 at
12085H.

..... and it is listed at http/www.lyngsat.com/freetv/United-States.html

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 03:55:58 GMT, "Pseud O. Nym"
<pon@blurry-vision.com> wrote:

>john wilson <jwilson9@erols.com> wrote in news:41310ED8.9090406@erols.com:
>
>> I discovered Montana PBS and watched
>> it months before it unfortunately was posted on Lyngsat.
>
>=========
>
>Montana PBS is still there. I watch it all the time. It is on AMC3 at
>12085H.
>
>.... and it is listed at http/www.lyngsat.com/freetv/United-States.html


LMFAO, I didn't even think of that. Perhaps he needs to peak his dish.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

We lost the BBC News because some idiot CALLED them. They had NO CLUE
it was in the clear until they were alerted to it. This was ITC for a
long time.


> Most times these feeds are temporary as EVERYONE damn well knows, and
> the operators of this equipment are not so dumb as to forget to turn
> on the encryption.
> I have always felt the owners only section of 4dtv was bunk, and I
> think keeping feeds secret is bunk. How come none of the analog stuff
> went VC2+ for the last twenty years?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:18:19 GMT, "steelblu<E>"@neo.rr.com wrote:

>We lost the BBC News because some idiot CALLED them. They had NO CLUE
>it was in the clear until they were alerted to it. This was ITC for a
>long time.

Do you have proof it wasn't dropped because their fiber backbone was
completed or something like that?
I'm the guy who called and got the porn turned off on T7! Damn CG!!

>> Most times these feeds are temporary as EVERYONE damn well knows, and
>> the operators of this equipment are not so dumb as to forget to turn
>> on the encryption.
>> I have always felt the owners only section of 4dtv was bunk, and I
>> think keeping feeds secret is bunk. How come none of the analog stuff
>> went VC2+ for the last twenty years?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:04:16 -0400, kryppy <kryppy@.> wrote:

>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:18:19 GMT, "steelblu<E>"@neo.rr.com wrote:
>
>>We lost the BBC News because some idiot CALLED them. They had NO CLUE
>>it was in the clear until they were alerted to it. This was ITC for a
>>long time.
>
>Do you have proof it wasn't dropped because their fiber backbone was
>completed or something like that?
>I'm the guy who called and got the porn turned off on T7! Damn CG!!
>

It is still there on P9, encrypted.

>>> Most times these feeds are temporary as EVERYONE damn well knows, and
>>> the operators of this equipment are not so dumb as to forget to turn
>>> on the encryption.
>>> I have always felt the owners only section of 4dtv was bunk, and I
>>> think keeping feeds secret is bunk. How come none of the analog stuff
>>> went VC2+ for the last twenty years?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 13:26:50 -0400, Gary Tait
<classicsat@yahoo.cominvalid> wrote:

>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:04:16 -0400, kryppy <kryppy@.> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:18:19 GMT, "steelblu<E>"@neo.rr.com wrote:
>>
>>>We lost the BBC News because some idiot CALLED them. They had NO CLUE
>>>it was in the clear until they were alerted to it. This was ITC for a
>>>long time.
>>
>>Do you have proof it wasn't dropped because their fiber backbone was
>>completed or something like that?
>>I'm the guy who called and got the porn turned off on T7! Damn CG!!
>>
>
>It is still there on P9, encrypted.


That's what I get for not being in the owners only forum!

I wish you could automate scanning DCII with a 4200v. No one has
figured that as of yet, right?? Or with anything else?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:18:19 GMT, "steelblu<E>"@neo.rr.com wrote:

>We lost the BBC News because some idiot CALLED them. They had NO CLUE
>it was in the clear until they were alerted to it. This was ITC for a
>long time.

We lost BJ Homesat (homeschooling) bacause somebody called them....

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:56:03 -0400, foo@foo.foo wrote:


>Well, then in a way I hope someone else posts all your private finds and if
>they do get pulled, you deserve it. You wouldn't by chance be a ham radio
>snob, would you? You sound like one of those ham radio snobs that puts up
>a monster antenna on a tower and then sends pictures to the ham magazines
>just to boast and brag about what he's got, while in the meantime his
>neighbors are all hoping he'll electrocute himself so they can get the
>interference from his station out of their TV reception.



Just wait until Pansat 2500A's and Fortec Ultras are $10 in
December!!!!!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.video.satellite.mpeg-dvb,rec.video.satellite.tvro (More info?)

On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 19:01:44 -0400, john wilson <jwilson9@erols.com>
wrote:

>Only irresponsible individuals post to
>Lyngsat thereby announcing to the world a "new" FTA service and
>increasing the risk of uplinker encryption.

I'm sorry, but I can't imagine the originators would otherwise have no
clue that their broadcast could be received by a home viewer unless
they found that information out on the internet. You might have been
able to sell that idea years ago, but nowadays everybody knows that
whether or not they're encrypted, someone, somewhere may be "on the
line" and seeing it all.