[citation][nom]dakota75[/nom]The price of a book has to cover the cost of the paper, the printing, distribution and storage. These are all overheads that don't apply to ebooks. So there is absolutely no reason why an ebook should ever cost more than a physical book. Even selling them for the same price is excessive.[/citation]
it can be argued that the information in the book is what you sell, and the paper is a write off, however this would be in the case of informative books, and not a romance book.
[citation][nom]jacekring[/nom]This is stupid...it's like saying that Microsoft can't legally sell xbox 360's at a loss even though it's making up the money through games sales.Amazon sells books at a loss and makes up it's profits through kindle sales. Same thing except in reverse. Price fixing is never a good thing and only hurts the consumers.I can see why B&N is on the side of the publishers...since they own brick and mortar stores, and most of it's revenue is from paperback sales not ebook sales.I think Amazon should starts it's own publishing house for e-book exclusives. Where authors can put submit books to Amazon for publishing, amazon would promote the good ones and give say 40% of the sale directly back to the author. Cutting out the traditional publishing house completely.[/citation]
kindle probably sold at cost or at a loss, at least when first introduced, to help establish itself at a product. its like how the ps3 was sold at 600$ when estimates put it over 840.35 (quick search, i have heard over 1000$) and they sold it just to make damn sure blu ray won the format war.
[citation][nom]palladin9479[/nom]The publishers were price fixing to protect the brick and mortar stores from competition. That Apple would lead such a blatantly illegal scheme is ... wow.The no bull quote from jobs's own mouth says it all.[/citation]
um... online digital downloads of videogames, and physical copies. they are the same price to protect their brick and mortar sales.
its not hard to find how common this crap is.
[citation][nom]jacekring[/nom]If I got it opposite, then it's only because the article has it opposite:[citation] To get readers into purchasing a Kindle device, Amazon thus stocked its virtual warehouse full of ebook best sellers priced at $9.99 or less, selling them for less that it paid for each to publishers.[/citation][/citation]
you didnt get it opposite, they were talking about the eairly days there, and you didnt take into account the pushing of a new format... they took an over all expected loss to push a format and a way of thinking.
[citation][nom]bystander[/nom]I agree that it's crap, but ebooks have their costs too, such as secure servers and internet connections. They are still going to be cheaper than books, but they do have overhead.[/citation]
put 2-10mb book on a server, have it downloaded once (usually) per person, go on to next.
you know, any youtube video is larger than damn near any book, and youtube is close to breaking even with advertisements that pay out 3$-10$ per 1000 views. call me crazy, but any overhead in the ebook trade is marginal at best.