[citation][nom]haunted one[/nom]Because whatever comes out to compete usually obeys the phrase "bang for your buck," unlike Apple products[/citation]
yes...there is something to be said for compartmentalizing - especially for those of us who are, in fact, prone to multitasking. like you, my phone is, well, just a phone although i welcome other forms of hybridization that seem rather more natural as transitions go (tv / monitor, for instance).
i would love to monkey around with an ipad at some point and perhaps own one down the line but i don't feel i need it and am comfortable being a late adopter to most new tech gadgetry.
the author would have done well to comment on the demographic and inferred motives a bit. save for the netbook / notebooks, virtually all of the hardware that is being supplanted by the ipad are fixtures of the home as we've known it for the last half a century (hence the tv room is the living room, and the living room was the parlor with the victrola).
regardless of one's critique of the passive nature of tv, etc (yawn), the hi fi, the tv, etc. have a physical, socially binding function maybe because they encompass a room and often become its centerpiece.
how do these other gadgets fit in the home? are the 'social' or, by virtue of their scale, even more impersonally personalized?
i've never been especially fond of carrying stuff around with me when i'm on the go and perhaps its because i enjoy home and hearth and all that exists in that environment (i.e. STUFF). going out has always meant leaving things behind. obviously those dichotomies don't hold much today and perhaps if i were 20 years younger, i'd have a much different take. i can only imagine what being a student is like nowadays - no more 50 pound sacks of photocopies and books, etc. needless to say, just because you aren't weighted down by satchels of stuff doesn't mean these lightweight portables - be they blackberries, iphones, i pads- don't weigh you down in other ways.