Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (
More info?)
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:25:30 GMT, John in Detroit
<Blanked@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>A better way (Portability) wise is to record to the replay, then
>transfer via network to a laptop computer of the 500MHz or better kind
>
>Then use VideoLan to play it back (Though core media player works
>equally well with DVD's or even POWER DVD which is often included with
>modern laptops)
>
Essentially what I would do. When I posted previously in this thread,
I was comparing a DVD player and the Replay. Note that I gave
advantages for BOTH WAYS (you always need to consider both).
>Or for that matter, Just use the DVD player in the modern laptoph
>
You could. A laptop (for either of the ways you just mentioned) would
be more sefl-contained (you would have less to hook up where you're
going to play the video).
>Mark Lloyd wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 23:02:51 -0500, Jeff Lindstrom
>> <j_r_lind@adelphia.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"joelpk" <jkollin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I was thinking of using a used RTV to manually record movies from a DVD
>>>>to watch later. I want to be able to take the "movie" with me by
>>>>carrying the RTV.
>>>
>>> Why would you want to do it this way? I bought a DVD player small enough
>>>to fit in my carry-on bag for $25. It's a lot smaller and cheaper than an
>>>RTV.
>>
>>
>> And easier to connect and set up.
>>
>> The Replay offers better controls for playback.
>>
--
Mark Lloyd
has a Replay 5xxx
http/notstupid.laughingsquid.com
"The idea that there is an invisible being who
created and still runs this old universe is so
childish, so obviously contrived, that it is hard to
believe anyone with even a modicum of education can
still fall for that scam."