Cell Phone Use During Pregnancy Could Cause Behavioral Disorders

Status
Not open for further replies.

pclee

Distinguished
Jan 24, 2011
45
0
18,580
"According to Taylor, it is unclear how humans are affected by cellular radiation, but he suggested that limiting radiation to the fetus may be a good idea."

Now that's good science. Put those research grant dollars to good use.
 

rantoc

Distinguished
Dec 17, 2009
550
0
18,930
And the history will always repeat itself, the companies who earn money from something claim its no danger and its often shown they were wrong (and sometime even knowingly just to earn money!)

Car emissions, cigarettes, asbest, pcb, plastics with chlorines and the list goes on.

Why not do real research BEFORE expocing the whole planet to something that could be hazardous for the health for a change? Let the companies pay for goverment driven research when they apply for something new.
 

GeoMan

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2005
22
0
18,560
Wow does Toms not understand this paper. I actually read it and the behaviours tested for could be applicable to behavioural disorders ranging from autism to bipolar disorder. They tested glutamatergic synaptic transmission, not dominie which is the most generally accepted neurotransmitter imbalance in humans associated with ADHD. Hell, it’s never even been remotely shown that mice are capable of developing ADHD. What the research actually concludes is: “In summary, we demonstrate that fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure led to neurobehavioral disorders in mice.” The authors explicitly say that the results don’t apply to humans because of differences in potential exposure and differences in gestation and brain development. It’s interesting early stage research, but it sure doesn’t say what Toms think’s it says. Damnit journalists, learn to report science properly, we all benefit from getting facts straight and sensationalism benefits nobody.
 

nebun

Distinguished
Oct 20, 2008
1,160
0
19,240
how about the environment the child grows up in...that's what really matter not the fact that someone uses a cell phone while pregnant....these days everything is blamed on smart-phones and games....everone needs a reality check...teach your kids how to behave and stop using technology as an excuse
 

GeoMan

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2005
22
0
18,560
As a follow up to my earlier comment, I was diagnosed with ADHD as a child and still have it as an adult. I’m also fortunate to be highly intelligent and well educated, which is why when I see reporting like this I get angry. It only serves to promote ignorance, misunderstanding of ADHD.

There is a strong heritable link with ADHD, even if a definitive genetic link hasn’t found yet (although there are some strong candidates currently being researched). There is a strong correlation between the structure of parts of the brain such as the frontal lobe, frontal cortex, corpus colossum and many more. Along with this are associated neurotransmitter differences, most notably the dopaminergic system. You can see the effects of all of this in brain activity when performing different sorts of cognitive tasks as highlighted in numerous functional neuroimaging studies. Once you understand the structural and functional causes of ADHD and you can link them to particular behavioural and cognitive traits associated with ADHD, you can start to decide what good behavioural and drug treatments are, and which are ineffective or even bad behavioural and drug treatments.

There are many environmental, hormonal, developmental, neurological, behavioural and other influences and disorders that cause many ADHD like symptoms and behaviours, but they are not ADHD and treatment of them may not be the same. Journalism like this only serves to confuse people as to what ADHD is, what causes it and what effects it has. This leads people who do not have the disorder to misunderstand it. Common misconceptions are that it’s only prevalent in males, it’s only a problem in childhood, it’s because of poor up bringing or bad education, it’s just a highly active or energetic child, or even believe it doesn’t exist, that it’s a conspiracy by drug companies to sell unnecessary drugs or that people with ADHD are just lazy and only need to try harder. That’s like telling a blind person to just see better. But worse it leads to people who have ADHD not getting effective treatment. The results of unmanaged or badly managed ADHD can be, and are disastrous for many people and the people around them. Yet people with well managed ADHD can go on to be very successful and productive members of society. Reporting like this is part of the problem, what you say as reporters filters into peoples knowledge and decision making process. You need to do better than this; it affects people’s lives in ways you have probably not foreseen.
 

phishy714

Distinguished
May 16, 2011
56
0
18,580
DO NOT BLAST A FETUS WITH RADIATION...

hooolllyy crap.. That is some very intellegent stuff. That research money is surely going into good use if that's what they took out of the experiment.
 

traumadisaster

Distinguished
Apr 1, 2011
2
0
18,510
Nobody said its a direct link, just that the mice had changes of some sort. That is the point, inform the public that research is ongoing but here is what we know so far.

Research and medicine as well are not an exact science, so thank them for trying to figure it out and learn through mistakes. Remember in the past we used to bleed out blood infections, give women hormones, and pass out packs of cigarettes to soldiers.

ADHD along with everything else may be used by some to wrongly profit. There is nothing wrong having a mindset of potential conspiracy, its called investigative reporting


 

dgingeri

Distinguished
Dec 4, 2009
175
0
18,640
Big mistake in this research: humans =/= mice.

There are many cases where mice can be used as a human analog, but not in brain development. Human brains are far, far more complex and far larger. This "research" just isn't valid.
 

willard

Distinguished
Nov 12, 2010
247
0
18,860
[citation][nom]Traumadisaster[/nom]Research and medicine as well are not an exact science[/citation]
Research...isn't science?

You weren't exposed to massive amounts of radiation as a fetus, were you? Because that's just about the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
 

anony2004

Distinguished
Jun 9, 2010
36
0
18,580
[citation][nom]bin1127[/nom]There's only one way to find out. If you have a pregnant wife, you should make a sacrifice for science.[/citation]

good luck and do tell us about the results then.
 

spookie

Distinguished
Nov 11, 2010
41
0
18,580
there has been sooo many studies that proved that cellphones have a negative effect on people....and yet they don't care. Cancer is one of the things that cellular radiation causes
 

dfusco

Distinguished
Oct 29, 2008
75
0
18,580
I would recommend keeping your pregnant wife away from giant (2-3 times her body mass???) muted cells phones for the duration of her pregnancy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.