back_by_demand
Distinguished
- Jul 16, 2009
- 1,599
- 0
- 19,730
[citation][nom]davewolfgang[/nom]You have to be careful here too, because Assange (sp?) has his own agenda too.If he were "truly" for openness, he wouldn't hold stuff back.[/citation]
If he released it all at once there would be no insurance to prevent the CIA from shooting him in the back of the head, oh sorry, what I meant was "standard foreign policy".
The US are such f**king hypocrites, Wikileaks was so great when they were embarrassing Iran and the Middle East, but were so short-sighted. Wikileaks is not on anyones "side" and maybe they thought it was, the same way they think they own the Internet.
These leaked Diplomatic cables expose just how infantile the US is and how it see the world.
Well now it's all out in the open the US has a golden opportunity to come good and start looking at the world in a more grown up way, shame the actual thing they did was get the spooks to find a way to spin more lies until they can "accident" Julian Assange.
If he released it all at once there would be no insurance to prevent the CIA from shooting him in the back of the head, oh sorry, what I meant was "standard foreign policy".
The US are such f**king hypocrites, Wikileaks was so great when they were embarrassing Iran and the Middle East, but were so short-sighted. Wikileaks is not on anyones "side" and maybe they thought it was, the same way they think they own the Internet.
These leaked Diplomatic cables expose just how infantile the US is and how it see the world.
Well now it's all out in the open the US has a golden opportunity to come good and start looking at the world in a more grown up way, shame the actual thing they did was get the spooks to find a way to spin more lies until they can "accident" Julian Assange.
Facebook
Twitter