silverblue
Distinguished
[citation][nom]feraldiablo[/nom]Operating temperature: 32° to 95° F (0° to 35° C)Nonoperating temperature: -4° to 113° F (-20° to 45° C)have you noticed that the operating temperature range is within the nonoperating temperature range?[/citation]
Nonoperating means when the device is turned off, so yes, it will have a larger range.
You lot are really blowing this out of proportion. How do you put a fan in a tablet? More to the point, if, by doing so, you increase its width, power consumption and weight, you'll only complain about it being too thick, thirsty and heavy. Raising the temperature thresholds will just make the thing too hot to hold, and then we'll get more complaints.
The Kindle isn't affected in the same way due to it using eInk, plus it's technically far simpler and uses less way power, but it's still going to have issues under extreme heat. The iPad isn't just an e-book reader, hence the added complexity and higher power and heat, plus its design doesn't lend itself well to viewing in direct sunlight, so why would you?
I'm not a fan of Apple, far from it, but come on, isn't this going a bit too far? zelannii is making some good points here. As for the iPad being powered by "magic", hehe... we all know it's not as good as it can be, but it's certainly not a bad first attempt. If people didn't buy a first gen product, we wouldn't get a second gen one, so you can insult all early adopters all you like, but in the end, it drives research into better and cheaper models, and that benefits us all.
Nonoperating means when the device is turned off, so yes, it will have a larger range.
You lot are really blowing this out of proportion. How do you put a fan in a tablet? More to the point, if, by doing so, you increase its width, power consumption and weight, you'll only complain about it being too thick, thirsty and heavy. Raising the temperature thresholds will just make the thing too hot to hold, and then we'll get more complaints.
The Kindle isn't affected in the same way due to it using eInk, plus it's technically far simpler and uses less way power, but it's still going to have issues under extreme heat. The iPad isn't just an e-book reader, hence the added complexity and higher power and heat, plus its design doesn't lend itself well to viewing in direct sunlight, so why would you?
I'm not a fan of Apple, far from it, but come on, isn't this going a bit too far? zelannii is making some good points here. As for the iPad being powered by "magic", hehe... we all know it's not as good as it can be, but it's certainly not a bad first attempt. If people didn't buy a first gen product, we wouldn't get a second gen one, so you can insult all early adopters all you like, but in the end, it drives research into better and cheaper models, and that benefits us all.