DTV reception is much more difficult than analog

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Mark Crispin" <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote in message news😛ine.WNT.4.63.0503291040200.6060@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU...
<snip>
> 2) The rotor is not integrated with the tuner. I would kill
> for a TV with integrated ATSC tuner and rotor control.
>
That would be OK, but slow and cumbersome. I would kill for
an ATSC/NTSC tuner with a built-in antenna switcher to select
each channel from one of three or four general-purpose inputs
(ATSC and/or NTSC). I don't mind running separate coaxial
feeds down from each outdoor antenna or preamp.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, GMAN wrote:
> I was just given a SIR-TS160 from a client for some DVD mastering work. Its
> the one with the directv tuner built in. Other than its old, what makes it
> obsolete?

The SIR-TS160 is big, hot, slow, buggy (as in needing reboots or even
reinitialization), and its ATSC performance is nothing to write home
about. The signal strength meter is not particularly useful either,
although many tuners have this problem.

Although you can use it without DirecTV service, you don't want to. If
DirecTV doesn't program your ATSC channels, you have to do a scan, which
erases any previous scanned results. Lots of luck getting the full suite
of ATSC channels programmed that way unless every broadcaster is in the
same direction...

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

Mark Crispin wrote:

>
>
> The SIR-TS160 is big, hot, slow, buggy (as in needing reboots or even
> reinitialization), and its ATSC performance is nothing to write home
> about. The signal strength meter is not particularly useful either,
> although many tuners have this problem.
>
> Although you can use it without DirecTV service, you don't want to.

But more important, you don't want to use it WITH
DirectTV service, in many cases.

This is because DirectTV apparently tries to choose channels
for you, and omits some. That could be fatal
for people areound here. We have THREE Fox stations, one
25 miles away, one 60, and one 68. For many people,
the one 25 miles away is hardest to get, since it is over a hill.
(Yes, I live in Flatland, but we do have a 50 foot hill). And
I'm sure that Direct TV won't give you the 60 mile one. For
may folks, the 68 mile one is easist.

Doug McDonald
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Doug McDonald wrote:
> This is because DirectTV apparently tries to choose channels
> for you, and omits some.

Actually, they just use what the zip code data says is appropriate for
your market.

> That could be fatal
> for people areound here. We have THREE Fox stations, one
> 25 miles away, one 60, and one 68. For many people,
> the one 25 miles away is hardest to get, since it is over a hill.
> (Yes, I live in Flatland, but we do have a 50 foot hill).

Lucky you. I'm on the wrong side of a 320 foot hill. I'm at the 280 foot
elevation, so that's only 40 feet of hill, but this is the Pacific
Northwest meaning tall thick trees.

> And
> I'm sure that Direct TV won't give you the 60 mile one. For
> may folks, the 68 mile one is easist.

Fortunately, you can set *two* zip codes for your OTA location, so unless
you need to configure stations for three markets you're fine.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

In article <Pine.WNT.4.63.0503291040200.6060@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>, Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote:
>I have two ATSC tuners: a Samsung SIR-T151 and a Samsung SIR-TS160, both
>of which are considered obsolete and not particularly stellar performers.

I was just given a SIR-TS160 from a client for some DVD mastering work. Its
the one with the directv tuner built in. Other than its old, what makes it
obsolete?

>
>Unlike you, I never expected rabbit ears to work; they don't work worth a
>damn for NTSC reception either. There's the small matter that rabbit ears
>are for VHF reception and all the ATSC broadcasters are on UHF. The silly
>little loop UHF antennas didn't work worth a damn for NTSC reception
>either.




>
>The only usability issues I have with my system are:
> 1) No manual programming of channel configuration; must scan. The
> SIR-T151 is actually better in that you can scan a single channel
> without deleting existing programming. The SIR-TS160 does not.
> 2) The rotor is not integrated with the tuner. I would kill for a
> TV with integrated ATSC tuner and rotor control.
>
>-- Mark --
>
>http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
>Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
>Si vis pacem, para bellum.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote:

>... rabbit ears are for VHF reception and all the ATSC
>broadcasters are on UHF. The silly little loop UHF antennas didn't
>work worth a damn for NTSC reception either.


This may be true where you live, but in many cities, there are one or
more VHF digital channels. Eventually there will be many more.

My town has two VHF DTV channels. Las Vegas has FIVE.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote in message
news:L9adndqiRa9CDNTfRVn-hA@comcast.com...

>
> I don't know what the answer is, but HDTV her in the US is a toy for the
> technically proficient and decidedly not for Joe average American at this
> point.
>

You seem sincerely disappointed by DTV. For me, it's a very good
experience. I have
good reception on my old SIR-T151, even on rabbit ears, although I can
sometimes get
freezes and tiling by walking around the room. I almost always rely on a
roof antenna,
but I'm just goofing withe the technology, not using it for TV watching.
(It's the same
with satellite -- I have three dishes and don't watch any TV on them.
They're just
my toys.)

Best wishes,

"Sal"
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote:

>
>"Mark Crispin" <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote in message
>news😛ine.LNX.4.63.0503290827490.22187@shiva1.cac.washington.edu...
>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Bob Miller wrote:
>>> -Word of mouth among ordinary TV consumers that they should wait
>>> coming from friends who have taken the plunge or who tried OTA
>>> and gave up. I know plenty of those in New York City. Lots of
>>> word of mouth in New York City that OTA simply doesn't work well
>>> enough to bother.
>>
>> Most of the country does not care about New York City's reception
>> problems.
>>
>> -- Mark --
>
>Mark, I will share my ATSC experience so far in the last few years.
>
>Purchased the Panasonic TUxx20 (can't remember model name now) as
>my first HD Tuner for $600. It was pathetic, couldn't pick us
>anything with a rabbit ear antenna and required me to
>purchase/install a rooftop antenna at my location 8 miles from
>downtown Seattle. Once it was working properly it took forever to
>change channels and to accomplish commands from the remote. You
>would enter a command a number of times because it didn't respond,
>only to find that the commands were actually in a slow queue and
>would start repeating themselves at some point. I hard rebooted
>that thing more times than I can count and sent it back to
>Panasonic twice. It's sitting in my basement unused and has little
>or no value for resale. It's a boat anchor.
<snip>
>I cannot recommend either of them to a technophobe or someone
>elderly. Current HDTV as I know it is too difficult for the average
>person to deal with. Having to put in 5-1 or 7-1 instead of 5 or 7
>is more than I seem to be able to explain to my parents who visit
>occasionally.


Many newer STBs and sets with integrated tuners are more or less
plug'n play now. Just plug in, turn on and the tuner auto-scans for
availablel digital and analog channels. After initial scan, just hit
Ch UP or Ch DN to go through all available analog and digital
channels, including sub channels.

Easy enough for Joe Walmart to connect, but grandma will still need
help. OTOH, she would probably need help connecting and programming
an analog-only set.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"none" <not@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:Xns96289662CA3A5not@151.164.30.42...
> "Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mark Crispin" <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote in message
>>news😛ine.LNX.4.63.0503290827490.22187@shiva1.cac.washington.edu...
>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Bob Miller wrote:
>>>> -Word of mouth among ordinary TV consumers that they should wait
>>>> coming from friends who have taken the plunge or who tried OTA
>>>> and gave up. I know plenty of those in New York City. Lots of
>>>> word of mouth in New York City that OTA simply doesn't work well
>>>> enough to bother.
>>>
>>> Most of the country does not care about New York City's reception
>>> problems.
>>>
>>> -- Mark --
>>
>>Mark, I will share my ATSC experience so far in the last few years.
>>
>>Purchased the Panasonic TUxx20 (can't remember model name now) as
>>my first HD Tuner for $600. It was pathetic, couldn't pick us
>>anything with a rabbit ear antenna and required me to
>>purchase/install a rooftop antenna at my location 8 miles from
>>downtown Seattle. Once it was working properly it took forever to
>>change channels and to accomplish commands from the remote. You
>>would enter a command a number of times because it didn't respond,
>>only to find that the commands were actually in a slow queue and
>>would start repeating themselves at some point. I hard rebooted
>>that thing more times than I can count and sent it back to
>>Panasonic twice. It's sitting in my basement unused and has little
>>or no value for resale. It's a boat anchor.
> <snip>
>>I cannot recommend either of them to a technophobe or someone
>>elderly. Current HDTV as I know it is too difficult for the average
>>person to deal with. Having to put in 5-1 or 7-1 instead of 5 or 7
>>is more than I seem to be able to explain to my parents who visit
>>occasionally.
>
>
> Many newer STBs and sets with integrated tuners are more or less
> plug'n play now. Just plug in, turn on and the tuner auto-scans for
> availablel digital and analog channels. After initial scan, just hit
> Ch UP or Ch DN to go through all available analog and digital
> channels, including sub channels.
>
> Easy enough for Joe Walmart to connect, but grandma will still need
> help. OTOH, she would probably need help connecting and programming
> an analog-only set.

Well now in my market the ABC affiliate uses their -2 sub channel for a
duplicate of -1 which I can't figure out why? The NBC affiliate has a
weather channel on their -2 sub. Auto scan also picks up the NTSC versions
of these stations as well. It's just really confusing for the average person
to deal with all of this plus the aspect ratio issues. I don't have an
answer save for...I have a hard time recommending it to someone who isn't
pretty much up to date with their technology abilities.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Sal M. Onella" <salmonella@food.poisoning.org> wrote in message
news:g5q2e.62607$le4.40839@fed1read04...
>
> "Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote in message
> news:L9adndqiRa9CDNTfRVn-hA@comcast.com...
>
>>
>> I don't know what the answer is, but HDTV her in the US is a toy for the
>> technically proficient and decidedly not for Joe average American at this
>> point.
>>
>
> You seem sincerely disappointed by DTV. For me, it's a very good
> experience. I have
> good reception on my old SIR-T151, even on rabbit ears, although I can
> sometimes get
> freezes and tiling by walking around the room. I almost always rely on a
> roof antenna,
> but I'm just goofing withe the technology, not using it for TV watching.
> (It's the same
> with satellite -- I have three dishes and don't watch any TV on them.
> They're just
> my toys.)

No, on the contrary I am very pleased with my current DTV experience. I was
an early adopter with expendable cash and knew it going in. I bought my
current HD Direct Tivo thinking I might get two years out of it. I just
can't recommend it to my 82yo next door neighbor who wants me to help her
buy a new television next week or I'm gonna be in constant tech support
mode. I also don't think my mid 70's parents are going to be able to deal
with the additional complexities. I sure I will go to their house and find
they have been watching 4:3 programs in some oddball zoom mode with a video
game color setting and not even know anything is wrong.

Plain and simple...there are too many options and too many permutations of
those options for the average person to deal with. Is the STB in Zoom but
the Television is in a different mode...etc etc.

I personally think that original aspect ratio should be the law and that
televisions should have built in ATSC tuners with no aspect ratio controls.
4:3 is 4:3 with side panels and widescreen is widescreen. No choices no
problems!

For a good percentage of the population a basic Tivo is difficult to use!
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

Mark Crispin wrote:

-snipped-

> Unlike you, I never expected rabbit ears to work; they don't work worth a damn for NTSC reception either. There's the small matter that rabbit
> ears are for VHF reception and all the ATSC broadcasters are on UHF. The silly little loop UHF antennas didn't work worth a damn for NTSC
> reception either.
> -- Mark --
>
> http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
> Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
> Si vis pacem, para bellum.

Those "The silly little loop UHF antennas didn't work worth a damn for
NTSC reception either" was the best performing antenna with the 5th
generation prototype receiver we tested last summer.

It was tested against at least three other much more expensive antennas
including the Silver Sensor, a Radio Shack VHF/UHF powered antenna, A
Radio Shack dual bow tie and a Wineguard Squareshooter. The loop was
easily the best antenna.

Pics here.

http://public.fotki.com/robmx/5th_generation_test/

Bob Miller
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

In article <2pd841lc0kcesj3ajeavurnn4eticin7n0@4ax.com>,
Richard <rstaples312@yahoo.com> writes:
> I am particularly interested in the messages here about current
> receivers for digital reception. Why? At my location in central KY
> reception of digital has been no easy task and, in fact, it has been
> an extremely frustrating experience.
>
> One of the problems is that two of the available digital stations
> broadcast on VHF channels 4 and 13, while the other digital and analog
> stations all broadcast on UHF. To make matters worse, one the two VHF
> channels is located at the BOTTOM of the spectrum and the other is
> located at the TOP. Try to find an antenna with good gain at both
> ends of the spectrum that is not a mass of metal!
>

>
> The closest DTV station (UHF) is only 2.2 miles away and its tower
> will also eventually become the home for a competing second UHF
> station which is VERY good news.
>
One comment -- 2.2miles away from a VHF/UHF transmitter can create
very significant signal levels, and with an antenna with gain, you'd
have to have a front end that can withstand very high signals. This
high signal can even interfere with other channels.

Sometimes an attenuator can be just as helpful (or moreso) than a
preamp. I use splitters (like a 2 way 3.5dB loss unit) to help
create some loss, yet it doesn't lose so much as to ruin all but
the weakest signals.

In overly high signal level areas, some of the distortion products
do reduce rapidly with small signal level decreases. For example,
the IM3 product levels decrease several times faster than the decrease
in an overly strong signal.

An attenuator can help matching and force nice matches to mitgate some
various notches and other damage to the frequency response.

Given a moderate gain antenna and transmitters that are 2-10miles away,
I'd strongly suggest the use of some 6dB attenuators. I wouldn't use
a preamp except after the attenuators, and use the preamp only for
distribution applications. If you are going to split the signal
for multiple HDTV tuners, then it might be wiser to use a 3.5dB splitter
instead of a 6dB attenuator -- totally avoiding the use of a preamp.

In normal circumstances, I wouldn't use a preamp in the vicinity of high
power transmitters. We could specify a good preamp that would work well
in those circumstances, but the output might be too strong for the HDTV
tuners further down in the chain. After such a preamp (e.g. one that
can do 10-20dB gain, P1dB 16dBm, OIM3 approx 30-40dBm, NF 1.0dB or
less with any impedance between 30-100ohms, input/output return loss
of at least 10db), then you'd probably need at least one 6dB attenuator
so that your TV front end doesn't overload with the possibility of
100-500mv signal levels!!! Such an attenuator can undo most of the
purpose of a near-perfect preamp, and the best choice is to avoid
the preamp all together.

MORE CONCRETE INFO:
The distortion products decrease MUCH MUCH more quickly than the
signal levels. So, if you drop the signal level by 3dB, you can
loose between 6dB and 9dB (or more) of the distortion products.
So, using a 6dB attenuator can make a HUGE difference in the ability
of the system to work well. One can loose perhaps 10-20dB of interference
by adding a 6dB attenuator.

John
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

John S. Dyson wrote:
>
Snippage

>
> MORE CONCRETE INFO:
> The distortion products decrease MUCH MUCH more quickly than the
> signal levels. So, if you drop the signal level by 3dB, you can
> loose between 6dB and 9dB (or more) of the distortion products.
> So, using a 6dB attenuator can make a HUGE difference in the ability
> of the system to work well. One can loose perhaps 10-20dB of interference
> by adding a 6dB attenuator.
>

I think you should also add that the problems you are talking about are
completely independent of the modulation scheme. COFDM and 8-VSB are
irrelevant to the discussion of overloaded front ends if the ERP of the
transmitted signal is the same.

--
Matthew

I'm a contractor. If you want an opinion, I'll sell you one.
Which one do you want?
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Charles Tomaras wrote:
> I personally think that original aspect ratio should be the law and that
> televisions should have built in ATSC tuners with no aspect ratio controls.
> 4:3 is 4:3 with side panels and widescreen is widescreen. No choices no
> problems!

I will agree with you there.

I don't have much of a problem with the tuners. They output 1080i so the
TV's aspect ratio is locked. The tuners also lock their aspect ratio on
HD or widescreen SD programming. So the only time that I even think about
changing the aspect ratio is on letterboxed non-widescreen SD programming,
where I usually want to zoom. Unfortunately, the amount of zoom is
usually excessive, and with subtitled foreign movies they often put the
subtitles below the picture. So controllability is good there.

The problem is with the DVD player. It defaults to full screen on all
programming, whether widescreen or not. I can't change that default; I
can only override it while playing. It knows perfectly well that it isn't
widescreen, because it has two different menus on its aspect ratio
control:
16:9 discs: Wide Screen (default), Screen Fit, Zoom Fit
3:4 discs: Normal Wide (default), Screen fit, Zoom Fit, Vertical Fit
Note that the correct setting (Vertical Fit) is also the *last* one.
Infuriatingly, it reverts back to [ab]Normal Wide every time the disc
program changes (e.g. every time you go to the menu).

Rather than fight aspect ratio battles with the DVD player (I never would
have bought it if I knew that it had that design bug), I simply set the
aspect ratio on the TV (which I can do since the DVD player outputs 480p).

The bottom line is that while I agree with the idea of locked aspect
ratios in principle, this can't happen as long as there are devices that
make the wrong choice. Also, there should always be the option to zoom
letterboxed material.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Blue Cat wrote:
> However, with
> some channels I have problems with Multipath, which causes dropouts.

Are you certain that the problem is multipath? As in, have you had your
signal tested with a spectrum analyzer?

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Sal M. Onella" <salmonella@food.poisoning.org> wrote in message
news:g5q2e.62607$le4.40839@fed1read04...
>
> "Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote in message
> news:L9adndqiRa9CDNTfRVn-hA@comcast.com...
>
> >
> > I don't know what the answer is, but HDTV her in the US is a toy for the
> > technically proficient and decidedly not for Joe average American at
this
> > point.
> >
I bought a Samsung SIR-T451 ATSC set top box last October, and, for the most
part, I get excellent results on most of the local channels. However, with
some channels I have problems with Multipath, which causes dropouts. Because
of this I can't sell the idea of digital TV to my wife. The minute she fails
to receive her favorite program, she will tell me that the system is no
good. It is a shame that "5th generation chips", "Casper chips", or any new
technology may not show up in future set top boxes.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote:

><snip> I think the HDTV tuner experience at this
>point is too difficult to recommend to people who could never
>figure out how to get rid of the flashing 12:00 on their VCR's.

"Flashing 12:00" on VCRs is a problem that no longer exists with new
VCRs. Clocks are set automatically. Like VCRs,ease of use of newer
ATSC tuners has improved a *lot*.

If you can read and navigate using cursor buttons on a remote, you can
click through the easy-setup and tuning wizard on new tuners. Some
external tuners also walk you through the Aspect Ratio settings by
asking if you have a conventional or widescreen TV.

IMO, new digital TVs and STBs are just about as easy to setup as modern
analog TVs.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Mark Crispin" <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU> wrote in message
news😛ine.LNX.4.63.0503300838371.1485@shiva1.cac.washington.edu...
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Blue Cat wrote:
> > However, with
> > some channels I have problems with Multipath, which causes dropouts.
>
> Are you certain that the problem is multipath? As in, have you had your
> signal tested with a spectrum analyzer?
>
No, but I am not too far from their tramsmitters. The stations that I have
problems with in digital, show up with ghosts in analog. In each case it
takes some fiddling with the antenna to clear the problem.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

"Charles Tomaras" <tomaras@tomaras.com> wrote:

><snip> I just can't recommend it to my 82yo next door
>neighbor who wants me to help her buy a new television next week
<snip>


$598 answer to problem:
<http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=2601425>


Just plug it in and connect to antenna, then auto-tune and watch
digital and analog OTA TV.

In the out of the box normal setting:
1. 480i channels are pillarboxed.

2. 720p/1080i channels fill the 16:9 screen.
4:3 shows are pillarboxed to fill the 16:9 frame.
 
Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv,alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)

Doug McDonald <mcdonald@SnPoAM_scs.uiuc.edu> wrote:

>I'm sure that Direct TV won't give you the 60 mile one.


Put two zip codes in the Local Networks in Setup Menu.

Apparently there's a bug in the TS160 that will even let you have
*three* markets in the program guide. I accomplished this by entering
2 zip codes in setup, rebooting and rescanning, then I changed the last
zip to a different zip and reboot/rescan again.

Result: Channel listings for 3 markets show up in my program guide.
They have remained there for several months now.

[YMMV]