EFF Sues Government Over Social Network Use

Status
Not open for further replies.

Titanius

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2007
54
0
18,580
The things with social networks is how "open" they are. I can go and look at this person's profile on Facebook and find out all about them, even in some cases getting information that I could easily use to track them down. If I was a detective/private eye, or a CIA agent or FBI or "insert acronym for an intelligence agency of your choice here" I would use facebook and twitter and whatever else to track down my targets, marks or whatnot. It is not surprising at all that we see the government using these social networks, they get more info about a person on those things than that same person's tax return.
 
G

Guest

Guest
"I doubt any serious terrorist is going to be tweeting critical info to terrorist cells."
why not it's a huge data streem and i dont think theyd be totaly direct.
i.e. code's like my dog needs to see the vet. = something like one of the gay's we sent on a covert op got shot.
who knows?
 
G

Guest

Guest
"The report clams that several government agencies did not respond to the EFF's original Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request."

Lol, I didnt know that a report could "clam" anything at all. haha
 

necronic

Distinguished
May 22, 2009
60
0
18,580
I have no problem with the government monitoring and doing analyses of social networking sites, but I hope these guys get their answers too under FOIA, and I will be very curious to see the results.

My guess is they are doing is looking for appearances of certain key words or phrases on an aggregate scale to determine the general emotional state of the world/country as represented on the internet. Kind of like Ozymandious in the Watchmen. Except they won't be sending in a psychic alien monster afterwards.
 

michaelahess

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2006
286
0
18,930
"Oh, by the way, we'll be wiretapping your phones Mr Mafia Dude, just wanted to let you know in advance!"

Yeah, they will really tell a watchdog what they are doing, kinda defeats the concept of SIGINT now doesn't it?
 

tester24

Distinguished
Jan 22, 2009
235
0
18,830
If the people who post on those sites didn't want their "private" lives exposed THEN DON'T POST OR PUT ANYTHING ON THEM!!!

I say once you post on one of those your whole privacy goes out the door. So the government can do whatever they want with that.

However if they had their information private and not many people do and then the government got your information by whatever means then I do have a problem with that.
 

mtyermom

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2007
104
0
18,630
I think the goal of this is to find out how exactly xxx gov agency is getting the information from these social networking sites. Obviously, if someone leaves their profile(s) publicly accessible, then the info is there for anyone to use, civilian or government personnel, for good or for ill. Now the real question is: what happens when someone wants info from a private profile? Are they creating fake profiles hoping to gain access? (masquerading as someone who knew you in high school, or any number of scenarios) Are they directly hacking/hijacking the accounts? Blatant invasions of privacy, both. Authorities should have to go through the same warrant procedure for something like this as they do with wiretaps, and I think to this point they've just been doing as they please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.