That article cites VR-Zone who really just makes a 1 paragraph
statement saying, "These are coming". yet doesn't source anyone. This same verbiage can be found in multiple forums on the web leading me to question it's validity.
Why is it that no one can point me to a working mobile 8800
anywhere on the planet? I mean, if these are going to be commercially released in like 5 minutes, shouldn't DELL with their infamous "
back door nVidia deals already have this part? Of course.
As all lies contain 80% truth, I would guess that the four portions of the statement that make up that 80% are...
:idea: The site hasn't gotten hold of any juicy specifications or other information about the chips aside from their names and launch months.
:idea: However, if these two GPUs do indeed exist, they're likely to be based on either 80nm or 65nm process technology.
:idea: The original G80 chip is built off a 90nm process, and its power consumption alone would likely make it difficult to adapt for notebooks.
:idea: NVIDIA will be launching GeForce Go 8800 GS in May and GeForce Go 8800 GTX in July and will compete against ATi's mobile DX10 M76XT GPU.
Final thoughts:
nVidia's hyping a vaporware release date so people don't start thinking ATI & DX-10.
IF you see a 8800 class card before Q4, you are going to see an emaciated version of what you are expecting.
I would love to have a marketing survey of how many people even have 8800 cards in their desktops,
and VISTA to run DX-10 it is probably about 1/10,000th's of a percent of the market... and the game developers know that.
Does anyone HAVE a DX-10 game? I don't. I have a Dual Quad Core XEON and an 8800 GTX with 768 MB of RAM, but I don't have VISTA and I don't have any DX-10 games. Correction, I have VISTA, I have plenty of VISTA's but I want nothing to do with it. I learned my lesson from Office 2007
Total piece of over rated garbage, and I got it FREE and took it off my computer!
I guess if I was MS, and my VISTA sales were as crappy as they are (oh yea, I forgot, it isn't MS's fault sales were bad of their crappy product it is the
software pirate's fault.), and I had all the problems of this OS roll out, I would find something (like DX-10) to hype and cut sweet deals to my channel partners so they could ram DX-10 down people's throats telling them, "You need this", as they do it.
I wouldn't say it if I hadn't been hearing DX-10 was "
right around the corner" since last NOVEMBER! But hey, it's right around the corner now... yea right, I am DX'd out (in fact, here's me
talking VISTA & DX-10 trash last December!.
What's more is that the figures suggest that 20 million copies of Vista are currenty being used, rather than having been shipped to OEMs and sitting on shelves. I would suspect that the actual number of Vista licenses in the wild are substantially lower, to the point of embarrassment for Microsoft.
I would say that almost all of those sales are to people who would have bought XP if it was available to them. To create the illusion of demand for Vista Microsoft's had to use their pricing agreements with manufacturers to cut off XP as nearly as completely as possible. If I was buying a new computer running Windows today, a hard requirement for it would be that it include XP rather than Vista, and I'm not confident that I could find one.
Microsoft's sales period for the license sales is significantly longer than 30 days—more like four months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4529d/4529d9b79d1fe490e855930b2b871a68fd7203e5" alt=""