• Happy holidays, folks! Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Tom's Guiide community!

Hmmm didn't I predict this over a year ago

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (More info?)

John wrote:

> Have you considered providing actual links for these things? Both
> refer to pages with no indication of speed tests.
>
> Here's one that actually works: http://www.dslreports.com/stest
>

Uh, DSLreports *IS* Broadband.com if I recall correctly

And that is one of the testers I used by the way. I've used a bunch of
them, at least a half dozen different ones, and all gave similar results
(Though I do admit some of them took a couple of tries before I got
the 1-meg/second rating due to server load... DSLreports makes note of
this in their documentation)

Detroit is zip code 48219 or 48240 and read broadband's speed reports.
I'm no speed demon it seems
 

john

Distinguished
Aug 25, 2003
1,001
0
19,230
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (More info?)

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 09:48:16 GMT, John in Detroit
<Blanked@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>John wrote:
>
>> Have you considered providing actual links for these things? Both
>> refer to pages with no indication of speed tests.
>>
>> Here's one that actually works: http://www.dslreports.com/stest
>>
>
>Uh, DSLreports *IS* Broadband.com if I recall correctly
>

Maybe. However, I did post the actual link. Why didn't you?

I did some searching from that first one (wugnet) and found 2. One
didn't work (always returned NaN Kbps) and the other would take
forever,

>And that is one of the testers I used by the way. I've used a bunch of
>them, at least a half dozen different ones, and all gave similar results
>(Though I do admit some of them took a couple of tries before I got
>the 1-meg/second rating due to server load... DSLreports makes note of
>this in their documentation)
>
>Detroit is zip code 48219 or 48240 and read broadband's speed reports.

Checking with my map, both are correct.

>I'm no speed demon it seems

I have 1024kbps/128kbps cable (in Texas), and am beginning to wish a
higher speed was available here.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (More info?)

MegaZone wrote:
> Tony D <nospam@nospam.com> shaped the electrons to say:
>
>>Why a Tivo cheerleader would post to a Replay forum is beyond me. But be
>
>
> Anyone who doesn't spout the party line is a TiVo cheerleader to you,
> I've been watching you for a while. So easy to dismiss any arguments
> you don't like that way, isn't it?

You've posted that you do not own a replay. You have no use experience.
In continual posts to THIS forum your basic line is, "No, Tivo can't do
this, no Tivo can't do that, No, but they planning to....., BUT DNNA can
remove those features whenever they choose."
>
> I'm not so small minded that I only want to read about
> products I use.

No but pontificating about something you don't know about is humorous.
>
>
>>And your assessment of Tivo's finances vs DNNA is hilarious. Like I also
>>said, don't list your theories, call a broker.
>
>
> My assessment? I see you also lack any reading comprehension. Did
> you notice how I said your post was full of FUD (you know what that
> is, right? Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt - a common scare tactic used
> by those with no real arguments) and 'no better than' the posts about
> RTV going out of business?

Like I said "theories" are unnecessary. Numbers do not "scare tactics"
>
> I think your posts about the potential Tivo/Netflex deal (which is
> just an industry rumor, I'd note) are pure FUD. Complete bullshit
> without any supporting facts. How can there be supporting facts when
> *neither* Netflix nor TiVo have made any announcements and the
> comments amount to 'no comment'.

They have announced they are working on this. And while there is
"speculation", there is no doubt on the hurdles entailed. CNET had an
extensive analysis of these. Like I said, Let us know how they make out.
>
> I do believe that DNNA is pulling out of the
> standalone DVR business.

What is there to believe? THey've said it. Escient and Denon media
servers are their focus.

> After the buyout DNNA dropped features then in development,
> like MP3 support and USB WiFi support, and they haven't updated the HW
> at all. Apparently not even a manufacturing respin to use newer
> components and reduce costs. There was one major SW bump for the 5500
> release which dropped Send Show and Commercial Advance and added
> Show|Nav.

The 5000 and 5500 software is identical. And I know you like to say CA
was removed, but actually DNNA made an end around the SB agreement and
returned it to 55XX units via SHOW|NAV. It's only purpose being to skip
commercials.

>
> You like to spread FUD about TiVo and call people 'TiVo cheerleaders',
> I like to actually intelligently discuss facts.
>
More than any company I can currently think of, Tivo is a supplier of
vaporware. But hey, keep skaking those pom-poms.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (More info?)

Tony D <nospam@nospam.com> shaped the electrons to say:
>You've posted that you do not own a replay. You have no use experience.

I don't own one, but I have used them. I know people who own them,
I've also read the RTV documentation, more than most RTV users
probably have.

>In continual posts to THIS forum your basic line is, "No, Tivo can't do
>this, no Tivo can't do that, No, but they planning to....., BUT DNNA can
>remove those features whenever they choose."

Really? What posts have you been reading anyway? You have an
interesting reality filter.

Actually, if anything, I'm probably guilty of saying "RTV doesn't do
that, TiVo does..." or "Why can't RTV handle that, TiVo can". I try
not to, but I know I do sometimes.

>No but pontificating about something you don't know about is humorous.

Oh, pot, kettle, black. Since you like to talk about TiVo and their
plans and *often* get it dead wrong. How many times have I had to
correct you?

>Like I said "theories" are unnecessary. Numbers do not "scare tactics"

HA! You are the one who posted bullshit FUD about 'exhorbinant'
prices when no pricing info is available. What a hypocrite.

Most of what you post about "TiVo's plans" are theories.

>They have announced they are working on this. And while there is

They have? Both TiVo and Netflix has refused to comment on
speculation that there may be a deal beyond stating that they've
talked about a distribution partnership in the past and that they
'brainstorm' together. Which isn't surprising considering Ramsey is
on the Netflix board, TiVo has stated an interest in providing video
downloads and Netflix has stated an interest in broadband rentals. I
think anyone with a few brain cells can put two and two together and
figure out they're probably talking about a partnership. But the
public discussion by the companies amounts to 'no comment'.

Here's some references:
http://news.com.com/Picture+imperfect+for+Netflix%2C+TiVo/2100-1038_3-5357336.html
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/09/08/BUGDH8L53A1.DTL
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-netflix8sep08,1,826716.story
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5915470/site/newsweek

>"speculation", there is no doubt on the hurdles entailed. CNET had an
>extensive analysis of these. Like I said, Let us know how they make out.

There are definitely hurdles. There are hurdles to *every* business
deal and every new product.

If a new company like Akimbo can cut some deals, surely companies like
TiVo and Netflix can cut a deal.

Sony is already a TiVo licensee, and I think they may be an investor,
and they own Columbia pictures - and just bought MGM.

Do you really think this is a *bad* idea? I don't think anyone would
make money on it for a long time, but I do believe it is the way
things will move and it is often better to lead than to follow.

If DNNA decided to jump into this arena somehow I doubt you'd be
criticising the move. And, frankly, the RTV units are probably better
suited to this since they all do progressive video and 5.1 audio
(well, at least since the 4k), while only some TiVos have those
features. So the RTV units could provide a better DVD viewing
experience from downloaded DVD content.

>> components and reduce costs. There was one major SW bump for the 5500
>> release which dropped Send Show and Commercial Advance and added
>> Show|Nav.
>The 5000 and 5500 software is identical. And I know you like to say CA
>was removed, but actually DNNA made an end around the SB agreement and
>returned it to 55XX units via SHOW|NAV. It's only purpose being to skip
>commercials.

You don't even read a goddamn thing I say do you? Try again, see
where I say "which dropped Send Show and Commercial Advance and added
Show|Nav." So what was the point of *repeating* what I said to tell
me about Show|Nav? Wake up. Commercial Advance is not Show|Nav, I
know what they both do, I know they're similar. But similar is not
the same. It is accurate to say they dropped Commercial Advance and
added Show|Nav.

>More than any company I can currently think of, Tivo is a supplier of
>vaporware. But hey, keep skaking those pom-poms.

Really? Let's hear it then. What is their vaporware?

Let me rattle off a few products or features announced by/for RTV in
the past (mostly by SonicBlue):
- MP3 playback
- Sharing content between the 4k and 5k boxes
- USB WiFi adapter support
- iChannels
- RTV/DVD Combo unit
- RTV/VCR Combo unit
- RTV 'thin client' for streaming from a full unit

Several years ago I heard an interview with some SB executive who went
on and on about how they would bring 'synergy' to their product lines
and they'd use the expertise of RTV and GoVideo to produce the RTV/DVD
and RTV/VCR combo units. How they'd bring truly integrated devices
into the home, and how they'd do it before anyone else. Uh-huh...

On TiVo's side what have they talk about as a product and failed to
deliver?
- Broadband content from JellyVision, RealNetworks, and Radiance as
announced with the S2 way back.
- Connecting MP3 players to the unit directly

I may well be forgetting things, for both RTV and TiVo, so feel free
to provide more. I'd be happy to have a real discussion of the
features of each unit.

TiVo/DirecTV? Check. TiVo/DVD units? Check. TiVo/DVD-RW units?
Check. MP3 playback? Check. Photo viewing? Check. Online
scheduling? Check. Sharing between units? Check. HDTV/DirecTV?
Check.

You can't count the Netflix deal as vaporware since Tivo has never
announced it or claimed it would happen. I also don't think it is
fair to consider something like TiVoToGo vaporware since they said
it'd be out in late 2004, so it isn't supposed to be out yet. If you
wanted to claim that I could claim the Escient media server with DVR
features is vaporware on the same grounds - they were both announced
at CES2004. (I was there, I'm already booked for CES2005 too.)

-MZ, RHCE #806199299900541, ex-CISSP #3762
--
<URL:mailto:megazoneatmegazone.org> Gweep, Discordian, Author, Engineer, me.
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men" 508-755-4098
<URL:http://www.megazone.org/> <URL:http://www.eyrie-productions.com/> Eris
 

Greg

Distinguished
Dec 31, 2007
372
0
18,930
Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.replaytv (More info?)

>Do you really think this is a *bad* idea? I don't think anyone would
>make money on it for a long time,

Why not? There is very little infrastructure to build beyond what is already in
place. This is really only depending on how long it takes the bean counters and
lawyers to agree on a price.
PPV movies are already sent "in the clear" I doubt you really need any more
protection as long as the net distribution stays on the PPV schedule. They can
always add the copyright flags or a Macrovision type protection.