Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (
More info?)
In article <Qt%gd.32615$df2.18737@edtnps89> Lorin@DAMNSPAM!v5v.ca writes:
> "Mike Rivers" <mrivers@d-and-d.com> wrote in message
> news:znr1099112547k@trad...
> >
> > Yes, I read what he said, but without knowing that he really means
> > this (and why) it doesn't make sense.
> Oh, you made THAT leap. Based on the many seemingly bizarre inquiries I
> read here, I've quit worrying about whether the application makes sense
> to me or not. Making sense of the reply is an exercise for the reader!
Actually, I can think of a reason for putting an index mark every five
minutes (or some other "clock-friendly" interval) in a long recording
of, say, a lecture, long sermon, court hearing recording and things
like that. If you know that what you want to hear is around 25 minutes
give-or-take into the recording, you can quickly jump there, listen
for a bit, and decide if that's the place you want or if you need to
jump back or ahead another five minutes. You're likely as not to start
in the middle of a word, but you'd get the gist of it pretty quickly.
On the other hand, if it's a continuous concert recording, marking
fixed time intervals doesn't make a lot of sense.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers - (mrivers@d-and-d.com)
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me here: double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo