Archived from groups: rec.audio.pro (
More info?)
Leap if you feel froggy. Just do it on the blog. I wasn't trying to get
YOUR piss-ant attention. I was making a statement about the seriousness of
the situation. But like all good republicans, you change the subject, make
personal attacks and draw it back on anyone with a heart, and then act as if
somehow you had it right all the time by your donation to the Red Cross when
your own Bill O'Reilly gave every liberal a hard time for donating their
time for 9/11 without getting a full accounting on what the money was spent
for, or, when the RED CROSS wanted to put some of the money aside for just
such an emergency as we have now, you republicans following Bill O'Reilly
and Rush Limbaugh yelled until their faces were blue with envy of all that
money being stuck ASIDE instead of INSIDE somebody's pockets.
You figure it out. Or better yet, don't try. I'd hate to be the cause of
some infantile brain injury on your part.
--
Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio
http
/blogs.salon.com/0004478/
"Jona Vark" <noemail@all.com> wrote in message
news:st6Se.415$pt.313@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Roger W. Norman" <Roger@SirMusicStudio.com> wrote in message
> news:M8GdnZ2dnZ2dmS3wnZ2dnfFthd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rcn.net...
> > Duh? Good answer from a twenty something that has not had his brain
> turned
> > on yet.
> >
> Again.. your debating tactics are very poor. Perhaps back to your blog
where
> it is more of a one-sided converstaion?
>
>
>
>
> > Don't bother to answer again because when it comes down to it, you make
> > yourself look worse by doing so.
>
> empty.
>
>
> >
> > All those that will help will, and people like you won't, but you'll
> wished
> > you did if you become the victims.
>
> You might have missed the fact that I gave to the Red Cross. You on the
> other hand are writing in a blog no one will ever see.
>
> >
> > Enough said because you have no legs to stand on.
>
> emptier.
>
> I see you're drained. Clean empty of worthwhile things to say.
>
>
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Roger W. Norman
> > SirMusic Studio
> > http
/blogs.salon.com/0004478/
> >
> > "Jona Vark" <noemail@all.com> wrote in message
> > news:KK5Se.400$pt.242@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
> > >
> > > "Harry Lavo" <hlavo@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > news:JIednZ2dnZ2EwznInZ2dndBDhd6dnZ2dRVn-zp2dnZ0@comcast.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Agent 86" <maxwellsmart@control.gov> wrote in message
> > > > news
an.2005.09.02.22.18.48.646047@control.gov...
> > > > > On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:20:25 -0400, Harry Lavo wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Perhaps the two ex-Presidents will be able to see more clearly
than
> > the
> > > > >> current inhabitant.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, maybe one of them. Don't forget he learned everything he
knows
> > > from
> > > > > the other.
> > > >
> > > > Frankly, I'd take either of the two ex's over this dumbass anyway.
> But
> > at
> > > > least Clinton can think into and through a problem and make personal
> > > > decisions as a leader.
> > >
> > >
> > > Clinton EVADED every important decision and left it for the next guy.
> Who
> > > are you kidding?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Moreover, he has a common touch. He would be down
> > > > there learning firsthand what needed done and leading from a forward
> > > > position.
> > >
> > > Yeah.. he commonly touched every woman he could.
> > >
> > > You don't have to go there to learn what needs to be done. That's the
> job
> > of
> > > FEMA and the city of N.O.
> > >
> > > That's why there is more than ONE person in government. DUH.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Symbolically, Bush just "flew over" N.O. on day 2, when landing
> > > > might actually have given him some insight. But there was no script
> to
> > > > follow, so.........
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have yet to hear ONE reason why the President should have landed in
> N.O.
> > > Exactly what is it you are expecting him to do? Take up vast security
> > > resources which could be used saving lives? Sure.. if he DID go into
> N.O.
> > > you would be whining about that.
> > >
> > >
> > > Give it up.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Facebook
Twitter