Once again, a lower standard of journalism. I have no qualms with the idea behind this article. My problem comes when you state that AT&T "appears to be finding out ways to charge as much as possible for every little feature." While I agree, this is strictly conjecture and speculation, and although the opinion can certainly be substantiated to a degree, it is not within itself a verifiable absolute fact, although it is reported as such. This is another sign of bad journalism, and I'm not satisfied with Tom's Hardware lowering its standards. Usually, it's best to keep the news feed entirely separate from opinion columns, though a combination of information and opinion is alright as long as there is a clear distinction within the article. By that I mean you must explain that it appears to YOU, the writer of the article, that AT&T is trying to find ways to screw over its customers for as much money as possible. This is far different from a situation in which, for example, a news reporter is covering a robbery and citing something which is near certain and a verifiable fact, like "it appears the door has been broken down", rather than "it appears that the man was simply in a panic for assistance", which would be conjecture instead. Come on, guys, it's not that hard.