iPhones That Charge Over Wi-Fi? Apple Is Working On It

Status
Not open for further replies.

hausjam

Estimable
Oct 6, 2014
13
0
4,560
I am not convinced current "wireless charging" (which is not in any way wireless, but that's another argument) is must-have technology. All it takes is for me (or more likely my kids) to bump the table where my phone is "wirelessly" charging, and I wake up in the morning to a dead battery. No thanks.
 

Six4One

Prominent
Apr 27, 2017
1
0
510
Hausjam, I agree with current tech. But this article is talking about charging over wifi and cellular signals. Your phone would be constantly charging if it had a signal. Knocking it off the table wouldn't disconnect the charging.
 

hausjam

Estimable
Oct 6, 2014
13
0
4,560


I was referring to this passage in the article:
"Apple has been one of the laggards in that space, and its absence from the wireless charging market has earned it some criticism from those who believe it's a must-have feature for any handset."

I applaud Apple for not adding Inductive Charging (as everyone SHOULD be calling it) as it's added cost and hardware, however small, that is fairly useless. Though I suspect they probably will add it this year, lest the masses finally wake up and start asking why their iphones don't have something the Galaxies have had for a few years now.
 

hausjam

Estimable
Oct 6, 2014
13
0
4,560
BTW, I know three people with the Galaxy S7, and not one of them even understands what wireless charging is, much less that their handsets are capable of it.
 

MtnFireGuy

Prominent
Apr 27, 2017
2
0
510
Your router's signal strength is subject to the inverse square law. If you are 30' from your router, the router would have to use some very high wattage to get enough power to your phone to charge its battery. Besides the inefficiency of that (since less than a tenth of a percent of the broadcast energy would actually hit your phone), at some point, you will run into FCC limits on broadcast levels. Those limits are there for two main reasons: 1) your safety, and 2) interference with neighboring transmitters. I think this is "pie in the sky".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.