Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (
More info?)
Steven J Sobol wrote:
> Quick <dhorwitz@nospamcisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Or did you mean that the behavior would not cause you to take any
>> action against the person? Say, for vandalizing, littering, or
>> causing a disturbance? How about if they went to the rack and
>> emptied *all* the items onto the floor? I don't believe "how much"
>> or magnitude enters into the determination of right or wrong, only
>> the response to it.
>
> (a) Vandalizing? How? I don't think so.
It's a matter of degree. Would emptying all the product in the
store onto the floor be vandalizing? Or does one have to destroy
something?
> (b) Littering you could make a cause for.
> (c) Causing a disturbance? If you just *walk out*?
It's not the walking out, it's dropping stuff on the floor.
Again a matter of degree.
> And if the person is already angry, I would just (as a store
> employee) walk over and pick up the product and put it back. If you
> think pressing charges for littering is the proper response in such a
> situation, my guess is that you've never worked in retail.
>
>> Walk out (after replacing item).
>
> OK, well that was *almost* what was being discussed, now wasn't it?
>
> The difference is that you are replacing the item first. I agree that
> that's the best way to handle things, but my guess is that the OP's
> intent wasn't to break anything or cause a scene, but rather to make
> a statement. Going after him for *littering* is an extremely
> heavy-handed response.
>
> Feel free to disagree with me...
I was not addressing the *severity* of the act or suggesting that
it warranted a response (I certainly don't think so).
I was nit picking your statement that it was "acceptable". Technically
I don't think it is "acceptable".
Do I think it warrants more response than a glance? No.
Would I draw an overall negative opinion of the person because of this? No.
Would I think it abnormal behavior and surprising? No.
Do I classify it as "acceptable" behavior? No.
-Quick