[citation][nom]zachary k[/nom]1. i think regular porn would have done the job2. at least he the guy that did it still has that voice in his head telling him "thats not right"3. there are "levels" to that stuff?!?!?[/citation]
Normal adult porn is not an issue. Almost any normal adult (men and women - mostly men) have porn. Even Sports Illustrated can be considered somewhat porn...
But yeah, after this article - I looked up the levels, I didn't bother locating the UK level - but found a "level" from Wikipedia. Which has a scale 1-10 (10 being worst). So that is a bit more detailed. But in general, most of that should get in you in prison.
Lower levels = having a bunch of PICS of kids. ie: a guy is a perv if he has 1000 photos of kids at park, pool, etc - clothes or swim-wear, etc. Compared to a father who has 5000 photos of his own children.
In the age of digital cameras, as parents - we easily have tens of thousands of photos of our kids.
Looking at the levels chart (no examples shown - duh, pervert!) - there are some nasty people out there. I've read articles in mags-etc about cops barfing at some evidence they find. Prison is a BAD place to be a pedophile... and a child killer = death anyway.