maestintaolius
Distinguished
[citation][nom]millerm84[/nom]Of course you don't have issues with Vista you run a laptop that has the horsepower to make Vista shine. The rest of you that haven't had an issue with Vista did you buy the "Vista Capable" machine of our dreams with it's Celeron CPU and 512MB of RAM that the majority of casual users bought? No you built a rocking system that put all the MS vista system labels to shame. And I bet all you did a fresh bloatware free install right?MS made two major mistakes with Vista first they didn't work with driver and other software authors to ensure a minimal number of errors when it shipped. It may be the responsibility of the software vendor to make sure the program works but who takes the blame when it doesn't. Two they released these "Capable" and "Ready" and what have you labels that led hapless users to purchase underpowered machines with a ton of bloatware. No wonder the world thought Vista sucked the majority of users never had the hardware to run it. Apple has made a couple of mistakes with the iPhone4 all of them PR related much like MS.[/citation]
Yeah, this pretty much sums it up here. The a good chunk of the drivers when vista first came out were just garbage, especially nVidia's. MS probably should have done a more extensive beta release to root out some of the problems that result from having an OS designed to work on so many hardware permutations (which they did for Win7). The custom built machines I have in my applications lab that run vista x64 (which I needed for dx10) have always run solid and completely crash free from day one when used normally (when I was doing some overclocking for component stress tests I got a few memory crashes). I built them when vista was only a few months old but I made sure the components I chose had good driver support and I had enough system resources (and of course they were bloatfree).
My wife's Toshiba laptop, on the other hand, was underpowered for win vista but it was sold anyway. The laptop was surprisingly bloatfree (I think I only removed one or two programs) and it was stable but it didn't have enough RAM so it was very slow. After I upgraded the RAM to the max the system runs pretty well but it was clear the whole 'Vista Ready/Capable' was a major mistake by MS.
Yeah, this pretty much sums it up here. The a good chunk of the drivers when vista first came out were just garbage, especially nVidia's. MS probably should have done a more extensive beta release to root out some of the problems that result from having an OS designed to work on so many hardware permutations (which they did for Win7). The custom built machines I have in my applications lab that run vista x64 (which I needed for dx10) have always run solid and completely crash free from day one when used normally (when I was doing some overclocking for component stress tests I got a few memory crashes). I built them when vista was only a few months old but I made sure the components I chose had good driver support and I had enough system resources (and of course they were bloatfree).
My wife's Toshiba laptop, on the other hand, was underpowered for win vista but it was sold anyway. The laptop was surprisingly bloatfree (I think I only removed one or two programs) and it was stable but it didn't have enough RAM so it was very slow. After I upgraded the RAM to the max the system runs pretty well but it was clear the whole 'Vista Ready/Capable' was a major mistake by MS.