[citation][nom]watcha[/nom]Sorry, but these few hand-picked and optimised tasks don't prove anything about slower or faster. The actual hardware is far less capable and if they had selected, say, gaming performance, it would have been a completely different story. The figure of 88% is misleading since it also includes very old models - they lost to the iPhone 4S and some other Android phones in even their hand selected tests. Any top of the line phone for Android, iOS etc would beat the 'average' phone in terms of speed in normal tasks.
What if 'where you want' is to use one of the thousands of apps which are only out on Android or iOS? Also, both iOS and Android make it single clicks to get exactly where you want to be, so I don't even agree for the basic tasks.
Exactly, apart from the implication that any of the apps are higher quality than you get on iOS or Android. iOS and Android have pretty much all the quality apps, but just far, far more of them.
Given what you've just said about the complete lack of a selling point and inferior app store, why?[/citation]
Users got to pick the task, not the MS guy
...
Users were people who attended CES, not just some random "guy off the street" and would have been more tech-savvy, especially if they are hanging around the smartphone stands
...
88% win rate was at the first event when no-one was expecting to have this done, but at a later event when people were aware of this test the win rate went up even higher
...
Just admit to yourself, even if not to us, WP got a win here, you just have to try harder with the iPhone 5