[citation][nom]timaahhh[/nom]*Note article makes it seem like Microsoft is doing something underhanded in order to get customers. That’s what I mean when I ask what’s with all the negativity.[/citation]
Well, if you know the history of Microsoft very well, you'd be suspicious of their motive and means. They were mustering their advantage on OS market to expand their territory, and basically eradicated many competitors in the process. To name a few, Lotus, Novell, Borland IBM and Corel. Apple Corp only survives because they are part of the system. They could have easily killed Mac OS by stop MS Office on macs or stop providing network support. That didn't happen.
The real competitor of M$ is Google, and both are battling for control of cloud. Apple Corp is not even close to be M$ competitor. To be an M$ competitor, you must have: OS solution on various platforms, office suite solution, server solution and search engine solution. Apple Corp has no real server solution and no real search engine, while Google got all these end user support almost free, and they are pushing Android now. M$ ignored phone market for a few years and they shall regret about that. Their Windows Mobile isn't anywhere inferior to iPhone, and M$ Form programming makes Xcode like shit.
I am not sure that M$ will win this time, since they had advantage but wasted by market myopia and lack of imagination. Google is pushing really hard on cloud and they have some other ideas as well. But, again, I wasn't sure M$ will win when I was extremely happy with Lotus 1-2-3 on Windows 3.1.