Musical signal processing web aites

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,alt.sci.physics.acoustics,rec.music.misc (More info?)

What are some good web sites that describe state of the
art signal processing of analog and/or digital musical
signals through hardware and/or software methods? I
would like to know since I plan to improve on them.

Of course I could do a search engine search but those
on these sites are likely to know which are good, and
I request you to follow up here rather than e-mailing
me, partly so other readers can also see your reply.

I am setting followups outside of rec.audio.tech and rec.music.misc .

David
http/www.nfld.com/~dalton

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,alt.sci.physics.acoustics,rec.music.misc (More info?)

Try this

http/www.musicdsp.org/

David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> wrote in message news:<cd718a$68n$1@coranto.ucs.mun.ca>...
> What are some good web sites that describe state of the
> art signal processing of analog and/or digital musical
> signals through hardware and/or software methods? I
> would like to know since I plan to improve on them.
>
> Of course I could do a search engine search but those
> on these sites are likely to know which are good, and
> I request you to follow up here rather than e-mailing
> me, partly so other readers can also see your reply.
>
> I am setting followups outside of rec.audio.tech and rec.music.misc .
>
> David
> http/www.nfld.com/~dalton

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,alt.sci.physics.acoustics,rec.music.misc (More info?)

I believe it's http/www.musicdsp.com. I'd also recommend my web site
http/www.dspdimension.com. Apparently my last post doesnt show up on
Google groups...

--smb

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.pro,alt.sci.physics.acoustics (More info?)

David Dalton wrote:

> What are some good web sites that describe state of the
> art signal processing of analog and/or digital musical
> signals through hardware and/or software methods? I
> would like to know since I plan to improve on them.
>
> Of course I could do a search engine search but those
> on these sites are likely to know which are good, and
> I request you to follow up here rather than e-mailing
> me, partly so other readers can also see your reply.
>
> I am setting followups outside of rec.audio.tech and rec.music.misc .
>
> David
> http/www.nfld.com/~dalton
>
>

There are few technologies that I see as state of the art. As far as
music is concerned I don't think analog technologies are advancing to
rapidly, so the term 'state of the art' might not be the most fitting
expression. There have been some recent advances in DSP, but they are
not very spectacular. There should be more to come in the not to
distant future. I think your best bet is to consult journal articles,
and maybe some university websites. The most cutting edge area that
comes to mind is that involving head related transform functions (HRTF).
You might check out http/sound.media.mit.edu/KEMAR.html or search on
HRTF for more info.

Steve M.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.pro,alt.sci.physics.acoustics (More info?)

> There are few technologies that I see as state of the art. As far as
> music is concerned I don't think analog technologies are advancing to
> rapidly, so the term 'state of the art' might not be the most fitting
> expression. There have been some recent advances in DSP, but they are
> not very spectacular. There should be more to come in the not to
> distant future. I think your best bet is to consult journal articles,
> and maybe some university websites. The most cutting edge area that
> comes to mind is that involving head related transform functions (HRTF).
> You might check out http/sound.media.mit.edu/KEMAR.html or search on
> HRTF for more info.
>
> Steve M.

There might be interesting stuff going on in area of musical signal
analysis. I also suspect there are people doing some weird things with
file compression.

Steve M.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.dsp,rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.tech,alt.sci.physics.acoustics,rec.music.misc (More info?)

David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> wrote in message news:<cd718a$68n$1@coranto.ucs.mun.ca>...
> What are some good web sites that describe state of the
> art signal processing of analog and/or digital musical
> signals through hardware and/or software methods? I
> would like to know since I plan to improve on them.
>
> Of course I could do a search engine search but those
> on these sites are likely to know which are good, and
> I request you to follow up here rather than e-mailing
> me, partly so other readers can also see your reply.
>
> I am setting followups outside of rec.audio.tech and rec.music.misc .
>
> David
> http/www.nfld.com/~dalton

A year ago I set out to "invent" .wav-to-.midi music recognition
software. At first I dredged PTO web sites for relevant patents...
didn't see any. then I googled around for pages related to
this topic...not much and mostly for the Macintosh crowd. So
I bought a souped-up PC with tons of memory and disk and the
hottest Audigy card I could cram in to the box. _Then_
when I finally used the term "music recognition" I found that
Germans and Russians have been hard at work on it Prowl the .de
domains, academic and commercial. The review of quality and
effectiveness that I got from an extremely proficient user's
point of view [he teaches music scoring for film/video at a
Boston area conservatory] is that all current products are junk.
What finally kept me from investing my time in the project was
that there are already free, shareware and rediculously cheap
tools available to download or rip off....I'd never make a dime
at it even though its an area that still needs some technical
breakthroughs.
-george