* this may double post, sorry if it does.
[citation][nom]AbdullahG[/nom]I wonder how a useless 16mm movie camera is going to affect NASA to such an extent. Sure, other opposing countries in terms of space exploration might get their hands on it, but seriously, it's a tiny camera! Even if they build their own and use it for space exploration, wouldn't that allow more data to be gathered and further advance our knowledge of astronomy and science? Isn't that what NASA was built upon?[/citation]
i thought nasa was built on, and i quote "(bleep) the russians, we will do this better and rub their faces in it on a global scale."
[citation][nom]tallywho[/nom]no joke it was our tax dollars that funded the camera in the first place along with the whole space program. Sooooooooooo we say let him keep the camera, quit acting like 2-year olds. the camera wouldn't have been built in the first place if it wasn't for the people in this country that supported you. You act like the keys to NASA control center are inside that thing.[/citation]
ever wonder about the irs?
lets look at that word
the irs...
theirs
yea, you kind of see the tax payers funded things being greedy when the people who collect are called theirs.
[citation][nom]joz[/nom]Whoever buys it, will test it for moon dust (yes, moon dust) and prove if it was ever on the moon, or not.[/citation]
i honestly believe we went, but you make a good point, it could be conclusively proven if we went or not.