NRA Launches Shooting App for iOS

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

susyque747

Honorable
Jan 12, 2013
39
0
10,580
[citation][nom]grokem[/nom]I guess I disagree with everyone? I think the NRA's stance on video game and movie violence is absurd. This app is completely different than the games and movies that the NRA objects to so I don't think it's ironic or hypocritical that they released it. I also think gun control, at least in the US, is absurd.[/citation]
And I think you are a little commie troll.
 

vertigo_2000

Distinguished
Feb 26, 2007
87
0
18,580
[citation][nom]wildkitten[/nom]So Nichole Brown Simpson is alive because OJ didn't use a gun?[/citation]
I think the point is that it's a lot harder to kill 27 people with a knife than it is with an automatic assault rifle. (/end devil's advocacy)
 

fuzznarf

Distinguished
Sep 22, 2011
23
0
18,560
[citation][nom]vertigo_2000[/nom]I think the point is that it's a lot harder to kill 27 people with a knife than it is with an automatic assault rifle. (/end devil's advocacy)[/citation]
In all actuality, Killing 20 children with a samuri sword would have probably been quicker than shooting them.

not to mention that you are misrepresenting the facts. There was NO automatic weapon used. There was NO assault rifle used. The only weapons found in the school with the dead guy were 2 handguns. The rifle was still in the car. @0:20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73aSK_fBk1k

the media has already moved on to newer thing to sensationalize and cannot be bothered to set the record straight... nor does the media really care to. Journalism is dead.
 

greenmachineiijh

Distinguished
Oct 18, 2005
13
0
18,560
These shootings are a huge tragedy and the NRA timing of the game release is not the best, I admit.

BUT, everyone is WRONG. These people that do this have a mental illness or are just plain evil. They researched, calculated, then executed their mass killings without any real provocation. They deliberately choose the easiest targets available and are SICK. The issue is not guns or video games. it is the mental state and the thoughts of the people who carry out these crimes. Murder has been around since man (and animal) has been. If a gun is not available then these types of people will find other means to do their work with. Does everyone not realize that in China there was a mass STABBING killing and hurting 22 children and teachers? and this is not the first time. When there is a will there is a way and taking away guns or games will not change that fact.

How quick our society wants to blame things instead of take responsibility for their peoples actions. Oh no, this person is not mentally ill or EVIL, the guns are to blame and the video game gave him the skills!! That gun jumped into his hand and drug him into the school and forced him to shoot the innocent children!!

Someone deliberately uses a CAR to run people over and the car is not to blame, or the speed the car can go. If someone killed people with a large rock then rocks need to be removed from yards and streets. No one blames Buck knives for stabbings that happen all the time and can kill just as many people. Following the same gun logic they should outlaw knives.

Playing a shooter game is not even remotely close to the real thing. Going to a shooting range and feel the gun in your hands and the recoil and real noise is training.

I am sorry, but get a life everyone! Own the fact these people who do these horrible things are plain sick and need to be removed from our society. You will never know who or HOW they will do these things. There a mass of tools at their disposal that are not guns and they will be used just the same if a gun is not available.

I personally can live without guns and violent video games. I have used and owned both and I am not for or against either. But the facts are plain. These people are the problem, not the tools they use. Quit the blaming.
 

wiyosaya

Distinguished
Apr 12, 2006
396
0
18,930
[citation][nom]mrmez[/nom]
Why don't we worry about something that actually kills LOTS of people.The CDC reports that ~44 people die EVERY HOUR in the USA due to smoking, and that excludes 2nd hand smoke. Thats a little under 400,000 deaths a year.Or heart disease: 597,689Cancer: 574,743Hell, Influenza and Pneumonia kill 50,097 a year.Or maybe look at motor vehicle fatalities, that took over 12,000 lives... in 1920.Yet here we are, pi$$ing our pants about 11,000 firearm homicides a year.[/citation]


IMHO, all preventable deaths are cause for concern.

I think part of the concern is the attention gun deaths get from the media. It would appear that the media does not actively discuss other sources of preventable death like medical mistakes perhaps because our culture does not want to hear that our "healers" actually cause deaths.
 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
774
0
18,940
guess Tom's writers have never heard of Halo.

Biden was meeting with executives from video game companies whose products have often been blamed for making players insensitive to real-world violence.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/biden-no-silver-bullet-against-gun-violence-212503247--politics.html

remember when marylin manson and korn first came out and every one was blaming columbine on them because the shooters happened to listen to them, just like millions of other teenagers who didn't shoot any one that day and the days prior and following?

i guess if you're one of the 40 million who play Battle Field 3 or the 40 million others who play Call of Duty you're a violent school shooter.

seems to me in every school shooting it's either about bullying or an adult having a problem with an ex lover.

more liberal b.s by the liberal advocates in the liberal dominated press spreading propaganda on behalf of socialism and communism and the end of freedom in america.

"One cannot wage war under present conditions without the support of public opinion, which is tremendously molded by the press and other forms of propaganda."
General MacArthur

"Liberals share a philosophy of 'no fault' living, premised upon the nihilistic belief that we are helpless pawns in this life -- that the forces of nature and society around us are overwhelming -- that we are essentially victims. ...Since there is no grand design or purpose to the universe, since life itself is nothing more than an accident, sin and guilt are burdens we don't have to carry. In effect, the rules governing man's behavior can be whatever we want them to be. This vision is inconsistent with religious faith, that is why liberals work assiduously to censor religious expression and substitute the laws of the State for those of the Creator of the Universe."
Linda Bowles

"Gun registration is not enough. Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms is the goal."
Janet Reno

"Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed."
Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control, The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.

"Your email demands that wealthy people, wealthy employers and wealthy corporations pay their fair share. I was thinking that I had heard this somewhere before. Then I recalled Norman Thomas, perennial Socialist Party presidential candidate and one of the founders of the ACLU, once proclaimed, 'The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened.'"
Representative Chris Clem in a letter to a constituent

"Socialism needs two legs on which to stand; a right and a left. While appearing to be in complete opposition to one another, they both march in the same direction."
Paul Proctor

"Statistically, fighting back is safer than giving in."
Curt Rich

"There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes, and the other is the Bill of Rights."
Major General Smedley Butler, US Marine Corps 1930

"I would add another reason - practice. Anyone who has ever been deeply involved in warfare knows that the only way to learn to fight is to fight. This may not be a popular view with the grass eaters, but I defy them to disprove it."
Col.Jeff Cooper USMC

"If you look like a rabbit, and act like a rabbit, you will be treated like a rabbit - prey for all predators."
Stony Loft
 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
774
0
18,940
[citation][nom]vertigo_2000[/nom]I think the point is that it's a lot harder to kill 27 people with a knife than it is with an automatic assault rifle. (/end devil's advocacy)[/citation]


only if you are deaf. it's far easier for me to use knife and stab more people in a crowd than it is to use a gun the second the BANG BANG starts people start to run and duck and cover.

given the choice of venue it would be far easier to slash 20-30 throats at a night club than it would be to shoot 20-30 people at a school.

it'd be far easier to kill 30 people by tossing a hand grenade at say a democratic convention or sporting stadium in the middle of the event.
 
G

Guest

Guest
With 300 million firearms in private hands (one-third of them pistols), the overwhelming majority of gun owners ARE responsible, law-abiding citizens, which is why horrific massacres are not commonplace, but rather terrible outliers that can never be legislated away (e.g. DC, Chicago, and “Gun Free Zones”).

For several examples for the recent use of firearms for defensive purposes not typically reported by the national media please visit: http://www.equalforce.net and forward this site to others to whom this information may be useful. @EqLF1
 

alidan

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2009
1,681
0
19,730
[citation][nom]mrmez[/nom]I blame video games entirely for every single act of violence.After all, before video games nobody killed ANYONE.Just look at WWII. Hitler was playing FPS' since he could sit in a chair! The result: 60+ million dead.I mean... just look at the link. Gun homicides are just up, up, and out of control!http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe [...] weapon.svgWait, what?They aren't out of control. Firearm homicides have halved in the last 10 years, despite the population AND gun ownership growing. But how can that be?Even the total number of violent crimes is down ~20% in the last 5 years according the the FBI, again, despite the increasing population.http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/u [...] nse-figureScary stuff!Why don't we worry about something that actually kills LOTS of people.The CDC reports that ~44 people die EVERY HOUR in the USA due to smoking, and that excludes 2nd hand smoke. Thats a little under 400,000 deaths a year.Or heart disease: 597,689Cancer: 574,743Hell, Influenza and Pneumonia kill 50,097 a year.Or maybe look at motor vehicle fatalities, that took over 12,000 lives... in 1920.Yet here we are, pi$$ing our pants about 11,000 firearm homicides a year.[/citation]

to our credit, we only really start caring about gun violence when its either a mass shooting

[citation][nom]blackmancer[/nom]11000/365= someone shot dead in America every 48mins.Its hard to kill people when you can't buy a gun, dead simple.[/citation]

most people dead by guns are... gang member who get their guns... illegally, and when they arent killing each other they are... killing an innocent person with... that gun they got illegaly.

gun laws will not stop people like them, the vast majority of people who start gun violence.

[citation][nom]kingnoobe[/nom]O really?http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/u [...] s/table-20Funny everybody is up in arms at 'assault rifles", but look at the stats closely. This is just another thing of a bad thing happened to a large number of bodies and unfortunately kids so it brings about a knee jerk reaction out of everybody on both sides. Even thought there are far more things that you should be concerned about.So concerned put my tax payer money to good use (instead of throwing it down the drain, giving it to countries that I could care less about, and/or pocketing it) and put police in the schools. Which shouldn't make kids afraid, but happy. Cops should be looked up to just like people look up to military personal (and yes I'm former military). Maybe even more so because they really are the ones that are trying to protect us from everyday threats. They simply get a bad rap because they gave you a ticket. Pretty sad when we can spend so much on armed forces, and yet can't find away to keep a decent amount of cops around in the states due to cutbacks.[/citation]

actually the cops around here get no respect at all because a speed sign moved 300 feet, and it was their for 3 months. and in those 3 months, lights on cop cars were never off. 24/7 tickets.

than you have the cops who are so fat they cant effectively do their job, so all they do IS give out tickets for things that should barely be ticketable.

and while i was still in school, we were put on lock down, 7 times, not drill lock down, and lock down was what they called it for when someone with a gun comes in and starts shooting. the locked us down 7 times so dogs could come in and sniff out pot.

yea, in my rural wisconsin area, cops get NO respect and barely deserve it... however swat does get respect because they actually deal with crap and are called in whenever cops may be put in danger.

the cops around us are the kind you really can say they are on a power trip and would have just been bullies in school just now they have a badge.

id like to respect cops... but in my area i just cant.

[citation][nom]vertigo_2000[/nom]I think the point is that it's a lot harder to kill 27 people with a knife than it is with an automatic assault rifle. (/end devil's advocacy)[/citation]

a bomb... i mean recently a method like that was stopped, but look at it, its a school and an enclosed environment, a bomb would do significantly more damage in that area than an assault riffle could dream of. yet in the same thing, the people i head the story from were tanking god he didnt have a gun...

its like people have no critical thinking what so ever when it comes to these things.

[citation][nom]fuzznarf[/nom]In all actuality, Killing 20 children with a samuri sword would have probably been quicker than shooting them.not to mention that you are misrepresenting the facts. There was NO automatic weapon used. There was NO assault rifle used. The only weapons found in the school with the dead guy were 2 handguns. The rifle was still in the car. @0:20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73aSK_fBk1kthe media has already moved on to newer thing to sensationalize and cannot be bothered to set the record straight... nor does the media really care to. Journalism is dead.[/citation]

lets think of that... would it be easier to do... thats hard to say... you could be stopped alot easier, thats for sure, but lets say you get one classroom, thats about all the damage you could do before everyone else gets out as fast as they can. sure, a sword could do more damage and be more efficient, but people have the balls to stop a person with a sword, a gun... everyone is running away if they have a chance to live.

[citation][nom]wiyosaya[/nom]IMHO, all preventable deaths are cause for concern.I think part of the concern is the attention gun deaths get from the media. It would appear that the media does not actively discuss other sources of preventable death like medical mistakes perhaps because our culture does not want to hear that our "healers" actually cause deaths.[/citation]

if you are a doctor or a surgeon, you are going to kill someone at some point. a crappy fact but its true. i dont like storys like that making news unless its was gross and easily preventable negligence.

on the other side, we have drugs that WILL kill us if we take them to long, like vicoden, something i will probably be put back on, while pot, at least in my case, could probably be prescribed to deal with the pain, but cant because its a federal law against it, and in states where it is legal, the dispensaries get raided by feds.

but lets go back to the way the shootings are reported...
they CAUSE COPY CATS...
that should be reported, as irresponsible reporting and our own sick desire to see it happen that drives ratings.

[citation][nom]f-14[/nom]only if you are deaf. it's far easier for me to use knife and stab more people in a crowd than it is to use a gun the second the BANG BANG starts people start to run and duck and cover.given the choice of venue it would be far easier to slash 20-30 throats at a night club than it would be to shoot 20-30 people at a school.it'd be far easier to kill 30 people by tossing a hand grenade at say a democratic convention or sporting stadium in the middle of the event.[/citation]

a real grenade yes, an improvised, no.
as for the knife... no, not easier to get 30 there, but it would be easier to get away with it.
 

f-14

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2010
774
0
18,940
[citation][nom]alidan[/nom]a real grenade yes, an improvised, no.as for the knife... no, not easier to get 30 there, but it would be easier to get away with it.[/citation]

you've got a point there but still very possible. drunk marines have done almost 1/2 that much at a bar.
but say youslash the bus drivers throat on a steep mountain road or going over a bridge bus driver with a busload of people/school bus full of kids going over a gorge or bridge.

point is, you may not be able to see how or why, or when, but somebody else has, and you can bank on bin laden and company having come up with alot more then me and you will ever dream up. i knew jets were like bombs with all that jet fuel but i didn't even dream of using them like they did and my first thought to which i said that morning in 2001 when somebody told me about it at work " how in the hell can you be so stupid to hit a great big building like that (in what i thought was a little air plane like a 4 seater cessena propeller plane the way it was told) how can you not miss that?! "
 

mrmez

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
266
0
19,010
Saw a really interesting photo, a mum holding a sign saying something like...
"If one kid throws a stone at another kid, the solution is not for all the kids to carry stones"
Great point, I thought. What IS the solution?
Ban all stones?

You guys should use your guns for what the 2nd amendment was designed for... get a million people with their 5 guns each, march peacefully to the white house, knock on the door and ask for Obama/Bush/Clinton etc to come down and have a chat. Ask them to stop financially sinking the country, and a million other things they do to screw you.
If every president lived in fear of that happening, the USA would truly be the greatest country in the world.

[citation][nom]wildkitten[/nom]Murder has been around as long as mankind has been.[/citation]

If you believe the bible [no religious debate pls ;)], the very first human to be born, killed the second human born.
Killing is in our DNA, if i can't get a gun I may not kill 20 kids at once, I may pick off 1 or 2 a year for the rest of my life.
 

wildkitten

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
200
0
18,830
[citation][nom]mrmez[/nom]Saw a really interesting photo, a mum holding a sign saying something like..."If one kid throws a stone at another kid, the solution is not for all the kids to carry stones"Great point, I thought. What IS the solution?Ban all stones?You guys should use your guns for what the 2nd amendment was designed for... get a million people with their 5 guns each, march peacefully to the white house, knock on the door and ask for Obama/Bush/Clinton etc to come down and have a chat. Ask them to stop financially sinking the country, and a million other things they do to screw you.If every president lived in fear of that happening, the USA would truly be the greatest country in the world.If you believe the bible [no religious debate pls ], the very first human to be born, killed the second human born.Killing is in our DNA, if i can't get a gun I may not kill 20 kids at once, I may pick off 1 or 2 a year for the rest of my life.[/citation]
The sad fact is, many Americans have no clue why the second amendment exists. They don't realize the founding fathers distrusted government and wanted the people to be able to defend themselves against a tyranical government that might take away their freedoms.

I've heard of the story about what happened in Texas several years ago, about a person who walked into a diner and killed several people. What many people don't realize, that even though this was Texas, the town it happened in didn't allow people to carry guns (at least at that time). A few years later, either in Alabama or Georgia, someone walked into a diner, pulled a gun, and several customers pulled their guns on the would be murderer. No one was killed. The customers carrying their guns, legally, saved lives.

In a free society police can only react after something happens. One of the benefits of the second amendment means people can protect themselves. The old saying is true, if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. By definition, a criminal does not obey the law, so what makes people think they will obey gun control laws?
 

Kami3k

Distinguished
Jan 17, 2008
575
0
18,930
[citation][nom]wildkitten[/nom] If gun control worked, why are the most violent places the ones with the toughest gun control laws? [/citation]

Oh you mean like Japan.

Yes, what a bastion of horrible deeds that go on everyday in Japan. So horrible that it is still a joke of a 3rd world country that can barely even make the list of countries by GDP.

Poor poor Japan....
 

Kami3k

Distinguished
Jan 17, 2008
575
0
18,930
All the gun nuts here are part of that problem, what is the problem?

American "culture."

Americans think the USA is the best just because it's the USA, the fact is the USA is behind many modern countries in nearly everything possible besides military might. And that is nothing to be proud.

I also have zero respect for the gun nuts as many of them were the same people who wanted to rename french fries to "freedom fries" and didn't care when the Patriot Act, or anything else passed.

So F*%k off with your talk of freedom, if you gave a damn about freedom you would of spoken up when those bills were being passed and actually want a UHC system.

Go ahead and downvote me, I don't care, you are part of the problem and that is simply reality.
 

wildkitten

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
200
0
18,830
[citation][nom]Kami3k[/nom]Oh you mean like Japan. Yes, what a bastion of horrible deeds that go on everyday in Japan. So horrible that it is still a joke of a 3rd world country that can barely even make the list of countries by GDP.Poor poor Japan....[/citation]
Look at the US itself. Look at the states and cities with tough gun control laws, crime rates are through the roof.

A good example is Chicago where the murder rate is horrendous, yet they have very strict gun control laws. All gun control advocates can do is spout platitudes, they can't back anything up with actual evidence. They want to blame the guns as if the guns are the ones that actively think, not the person wielding it. I talked earlier about the football player Belcher who killed his girlfriend and all these gun control advocates that say if only he had not had a gun she would be alive, yet conveniently forget OJ Simpson used a knife to kill his ex-wife. Knives have been used as murder weapons far far before guns were ever invented. Where is the call to ban all knives?

Also, why is there this rush to destroy part of the Constitution? Since you want to take away second amendment rights, how about I take away your first amendment rights? Seems only fair to me.

The fact of the matter is this is a societal problem. We devalue life constantly. Guns don't cause people to kill someone else, video games do not cause someone to kill someone else. Are there some ridiculously violent video games? Yes, but could they be popular if people were not already desensitized to human death and suffering?
 

Donsai

Distinguished
May 20, 2009
2
0
18,510
[citation][nom]mugiebahar[/nom]Are u freakin kidding me? Say what you want about the whole gun debate. And say what you want about the other video games and this app being different. You have to really have your head up your ass to think for 1 logical second that this is smart. How freakin dumb R U? Look if this were another time maybe (maybe I give you) this would or could go over. But you dumb ass LePierre, you are a freaking retarded dumb ass. Like dam you stupid freaking dumb ass. Have you no logic in your freaking stupid brain of yours? Right now the whole subject is a sensitive matter and you just screwed your own ass by being so stupid.[/citation]

Worst. Post. Ever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.