belardo
Distinguished
This is a rather sour and unimpressive article about the iPad2HD. For the most part, all your reasons are plain weak. The only let-down about the New iPad is the stupid name, which may not be the name when it ships. "I'm selling a Used New iPad" or in 2015 "I've got a new ipad for cheap"- Ugh. They should gone with iPad3 or iPad2-HD or iPad2G. One of the rumors about the new iPad was going to have an intro price of $650... ouch.
Lets go over Wolfgangs' issues:
1: Layered 3D display and gesture expansion = NONE ISSUE
3D is in the future... not for today and keep the prices reasonable. The Display on the Nintendo 3Ds is fuzzy compared to a high quality 2D display, it still looks good - but its not usable for the functions of a tablet... a business product. THANK GOD it doesn't have 3D.
Not really sold on the bezel gesture, Apple may not want to pay royalities on that... the big bezel area is used as a place to HOLD the unit without covering the screen.
Really: I thought "what a stupid looking big bezel, they should make it edge to edge". (A) the battery is bigger than the screen area. (B) holding the unit.
Instead, for the same price - Apple comes out with a product with twice the resolution (okay 4x if you really do the math), same size & type of body so almost all current the accessories fit it. beefed up GPU, etc... For the most part, there is nothing on the market that is currently competing against the iPad2, other than the top end ASUS Transformer Prime.
2: No quad-core CPU = none issue
Actual usage and battery prevents a quad core setup. Also, there has to be worthwhile gains.
Compare the AMD FX8150 "8 core" CPU which is constantly slower than intel's 4-core CPUs... besides requiring less power and generating less heat... oh yeah, costs less too. My iPad1 (single core) still performs quite well with what it came with.
3: Where is my cheap iPad 2 = You got it
$400, its cheaper.... okay, its about $70 cheaper. Give it 6 months and they'll be down to $350 or. Who knows... but its not a $200 Kindle Fire which doesn't have any cameras, or larger screen and battery of iPads. It also puts it in direct competition with the $400 ASUS Transformer.
4: A 5MP camera? = Really?
Perhaps your weakest argument. This is a tablet, not a CAMERA. The sensor and other factors are more important than MP. The iPad2-HD has a 3MP display... what is it going to do with a 40MP camera? Also such high MP images sucks up far more space. My little 8MP P&S camera is on 5MP mode... I won't be making prints with it. My $6000 Nikon DSLR Camera is an old 6MP D1x model... it'll smoke any 12MP $100 P&S camera every time. I also have a Canon semi-pro 8MP camera (when I need features, but don't want the bulk) which does great... but its not as good as a good DSLR camera.
I'd like to see Apple and others try to fit slightly bigger sensors.... rather than more MP.
5: Storage = your best one
This could be valid... but I'm not close to filling up my iPad1-32GB model. As prices come down, we will see 128GB tablets. Not today... maybe in 2016 or so. Anyone else thinking about a 128GB tablet?
The good thing about NOT having an external memory card: another hole for which to damage the unit. A cheap memory card that could fail = loss of data or stolen data card. The market share of 64GB tablets is tiny. The 32GB model sells the most.
The stupid "New iPad" is the worst thing about this new product.
* the iPad is the ONLY apple product I have ever bought in my life. All my desktops and notebooks are Windows7, my phone is Android. I won't be going to AppleOS any time soon.
My next tablet maybe the iPad2-HD... unless Windows8Mobile or Android does somethings to make them worth buying.... I'm not married to my iPad, but what I get must work just as good or better.
Lets go over Wolfgangs' issues:
1: Layered 3D display and gesture expansion = NONE ISSUE
3D is in the future... not for today and keep the prices reasonable. The Display on the Nintendo 3Ds is fuzzy compared to a high quality 2D display, it still looks good - but its not usable for the functions of a tablet... a business product. THANK GOD it doesn't have 3D.
Not really sold on the bezel gesture, Apple may not want to pay royalities on that... the big bezel area is used as a place to HOLD the unit without covering the screen.
Really: I thought "what a stupid looking big bezel, they should make it edge to edge". (A) the battery is bigger than the screen area. (B) holding the unit.
Instead, for the same price - Apple comes out with a product with twice the resolution (okay 4x if you really do the math), same size & type of body so almost all current the accessories fit it. beefed up GPU, etc... For the most part, there is nothing on the market that is currently competing against the iPad2, other than the top end ASUS Transformer Prime.
2: No quad-core CPU = none issue
Actual usage and battery prevents a quad core setup. Also, there has to be worthwhile gains.
Compare the AMD FX8150 "8 core" CPU which is constantly slower than intel's 4-core CPUs... besides requiring less power and generating less heat... oh yeah, costs less too. My iPad1 (single core) still performs quite well with what it came with.
3: Where is my cheap iPad 2 = You got it
$400, its cheaper.... okay, its about $70 cheaper. Give it 6 months and they'll be down to $350 or. Who knows... but its not a $200 Kindle Fire which doesn't have any cameras, or larger screen and battery of iPads. It also puts it in direct competition with the $400 ASUS Transformer.
4: A 5MP camera? = Really?
Perhaps your weakest argument. This is a tablet, not a CAMERA. The sensor and other factors are more important than MP. The iPad2-HD has a 3MP display... what is it going to do with a 40MP camera? Also such high MP images sucks up far more space. My little 8MP P&S camera is on 5MP mode... I won't be making prints with it. My $6000 Nikon DSLR Camera is an old 6MP D1x model... it'll smoke any 12MP $100 P&S camera every time. I also have a Canon semi-pro 8MP camera (when I need features, but don't want the bulk) which does great... but its not as good as a good DSLR camera.
I'd like to see Apple and others try to fit slightly bigger sensors.... rather than more MP.
5: Storage = your best one
This could be valid... but I'm not close to filling up my iPad1-32GB model. As prices come down, we will see 128GB tablets. Not today... maybe in 2016 or so. Anyone else thinking about a 128GB tablet?
The good thing about NOT having an external memory card: another hole for which to damage the unit. A cheap memory card that could fail = loss of data or stolen data card. The market share of 64GB tablets is tiny. The 32GB model sells the most.
The stupid "New iPad" is the worst thing about this new product.
* the iPad is the ONLY apple product I have ever bought in my life. All my desktops and notebooks are Windows7, my phone is Android. I won't be going to AppleOS any time soon.
My next tablet maybe the iPad2-HD... unless Windows8Mobile or Android does somethings to make them worth buying.... I'm not married to my iPad, but what I get must work just as good or better.