Playboy's Website Without Boobs is Safe for Work

[joebob2000]

[citation][nom]rtfm[/nom]With all the free porn floating around on the internet, I'm surprised Playboy hasn't gone bust yet.[/citation]
I see what you did there!

 

[zachary k]

the articles, that's why you read it 😉

 

[silky salamandr]

[citation][nom]mavroxur[/nom]It's like Tuan's posts without the Apple propaganda.[/citation]

Or like Marcus Yam's posts without the logicbuy ads.

 

[dark_lord69]

Think about car shops and how man can't put up calanders of NON-naked women because it's "sexual herassmint". So, do you really think looking a pictures of women posing won't get you in trouble?

 

[Gin Fushicho]

tch, who needs playboy? We got porn.... then again, playboy has more actually good looking women in it than most pornos.

 

[JOSHSKORN]

No boobs? Then what's the point?? I mean, c'mon...it's Playboy! Not...Playnews.

 

[ElCdt]

No boobs?? How about side boobs? That turn ya on? Well it shouldn´t, ´cause that´s MY side boob. Goodnight everybody.

 

[abbadon_34]

wow, and thought Hugh would NEVER get OLD ):

 

[belardo]

[citation][nom]rooket[/nom]Playboy is really softcore, I can't understand how they make money. But porn is way overdone these days anyway. Playboy some people will argue with me is "Art" well I lately prefer to just see women for who they are.[/citation]

Some like hard core, some just want to look at well done photos... sometimes we get both. Its a matter of taste and what you're in the mood for. You'll find some celebs who'll do playboy but never hardcore... so yes, Playboy has a place in the adult market place.

They are the original MENS magazine. MAXIM is the modernized version that is more hip - shorter articles (young people cant read much without brain failure) and no actual nudity - so they can be sold in places that Playboy can't (7-11, Barnes & Noble, Walmart and supermarkets, etc).

I'll admit thou... I've bought fare more MAXIM magazines in the past 7 years than playboy in 15... Maybe 1, I think vs dozen.

 

[descendency]

So, it's just articles??? lame...

 

[gm0n3y]

So Playboy isn't making money and they decide that they just have TOO MUCH porn? If anything Playboy sucks because its too high-class and boring. Nobody wants magazines. Look at Vivid, they're hugely successful.

 

[grieve]

[citation][nom]ElCdt[/nom]No boobs?? How about side boobs? That turn ya on? Well it shouldn´t, ´cause that´s MY side boob. Goodnight everybody.[/citation]
lol, peter 4 the win!

 

[WyomingKnott]

"Playboy's Safe for Work Website is Without Boobs"
Except for the ones who navigate to it from work.

 

[failboat]

free pr0n > playboy

 

[MotionMan]

Sure I'll read it.
For the articles.

 

[MotionMan]

Sure I'll read it.
For the articles.