Donny Stanley :
I'm a PC user (and hardware reviewer) and I do not own a console and don't plan on buying one either.
Your article misses the point of the Scorpio and Neo, almost entirely. It usesd to be that every 5-8 years, a new console generation would arrive that would break future support for the older generation, as well as compatibility with older games. It would split the player base, because you can only play with users using the same same console as you.
However, that is not the case anymore. With the new approach, these companies can keep iterating on hardware, bringing new customers (are current ones who want an upgrade) more performance and an improved experience without breaking up the community, or breaking support...
Your argument is "If I buy this today, in a year or two there will be something better and that hurts my feelings" That makes no sense. Buying an Xbox One S today doesn't make your purchase any less secure just because a Scorpio arrives in a year and a half.
Hi! Thanks for reading it. And for the thorough reply.
I see where you're coming from. I am a little miffed that my $400 PS4 wont be the latest soon.
But you'll see in the piece I mentioned keeping your existing PS4 or Xbox One to play more games in the future. I may very well do that myself until I see how it all shakes out.
As a console gamer, my biggest thing to get used to will be the pricing. Because I'm not just a gamer, I'm a techie, and I love having the latest stuff. Admittedly, that's on me. But that's where the value question comes in.
If I do upgrade (and again, I don't have to), it will cost a lot. To match up with what a gaming PC can already do. It's the same for all considering this upgrade.
I'm happy gamers have choices. But this is a big shift in how consoles work from a sales perspective, and everyone should see what's best for them and their limited, hard-end funds. If a PC is the more affordable long term choice, it's a better value. If money is not an issue, you're golden. It won't stop me from gaming.