[citation][nom]Vladislaus[/nom]You do know that the A5 is the only iPhone/iPod/iPad CPU thus far that Apple designed. Before the A4, Apple bought it's chips from Samsung. The A4 was the first SoC designed by Apple, but the CPU in it was designed by Intrinsity (later bought by Apple) and Samsung. This is the reason why the CPU in the Samsung Galaxy S and the iPhone 4 are identical. The A5 is the only SoC completely designed by Apple, all other were bought from Samsung or built upon a Samsung design so doesn't it stand to reason that it was perhaps the other way around?[/citation]
You do know that there is more to a phone than the processor used, and that any accusations of 'copying' levelled at Samsung by Apple have not been anything to do with the processor, but in fact due to copying the design aspect which was very much created entirely by Apple. A CPU choice and design can tell you a lot about the device, even indirect components.
The reason ericburnby cited the chip is that it gives Samsung information on the time scales, launches, volumes, etc which alone tells them a lot about the architecture of the devices, even in OLD cases where the CPU wasn't designed by Apple
As it happens, the fact that the A5 is used in all the current top-tier products means that the CURRENT case (we're all living in the present, right?) is that Samsung manufacturers to Apples design, and we've already seen examples of them trying to copy that in the legal case - which, by the way, another case was won by Apple preventing sales of the Galaxy Tab again yesterday. At least the law can see blatantly copying when it happens - I mean even the packaging was the same, ridiculous

Anyway, I digress. The point is that whether or not the CPU was designed by Apple or not is irrelevant since it gives Samsung all kinds of other information, and also the fact that the new chips ARE designed by Apple makes the past process irrelevant.