[citation][nom]amk-aka-phantom[/nom]I'm sure as hell angry at any company that sells BS product which is overpriced... why? Explain me that. And don't go BS about "design" and "quality", I've held iPhones and their quality is just like any other phone and the design is absent (all touchscreen phones suffer from that, sadly, save Nokia N8).[/citation]
I had a Samsung, and a Nokia before my iPhone. They were absolutely awful in comparison. That being said, I think a lot of Android phones are good. They have some security issues due to being so open, most notably recently with wireless problems, but generally competition is something I favour. I got my iPhone because the user interface felt the fastest, as in the most responsive, and because I wanted to watch Sky sports on my phone. I can't do that with any other phone. Of course, this does not mean I'm going to sit here and claim that the iPhone 5 will be the best phone ever, it doesn't.
Which brings me on to my point. To call a product an 'overpriced' 'POS' before either a) The product or b) The pricing is released, is quite frankly irrational. An irrational hatred of a company, who whether you like them or not have themselves moved on consumer devices to at least whatever extent you agree to. It's all a bit pathetic. I'm going to be giving my iPhone 4 to my girlfriend, and am looking for the next phone - but I'll be keeping all my options open. I'll wait to see what they perform like, and then choose. I wont choose based on the label, such as you guys who are ruling the iPhone out already (ironically you are the ones who pick by label whilst accusing people who buy the iPhones of doing that).
When I bought my iPhone it was the fastest, most responsive phone with the best battery life and Sky Sports, that is the reality, and for me it was the right choice - but that doesn't mean I'll irrationally defend all iPhones to the hilt regardless of how good competitors are.