Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (
More info?)
Bradley Burton wrote:
> What is your opinion of which one is better? Can you fill me in a little.
>
> Thanks, Brad
Not a simple question which is probably why you didn't get many
replies. They both have pros & cons, the main pro for the DLP RP TVs
being their lower price for the bigger screens. You can find a lot about
the two TV types in the LCD/Plasma and RP TV forums at avsforum.com.
The main cons to the DLP RP TVs are limited viewing angles, possible
rainbow effects due to the color wheel, some complaints about the odd
clay color effect in picture quality, and that they have an expensive
$300 to $400 bulb that has to be replaced every few years (or 4000 to
8000 hours of use). The number of problem reports with the Samsung DLP
sets was one reason I moved away from getting one.
The plasmas on the other hand cost more, especially if you want a 50"
HD TV. The plasmas also vary a lot more in picture quality between the
cheap and brand names than do the DLP sets. If you go the plasma route,
I would stick with the better brand names - Panasonic, Pioneer, the
XS955 Sonys, Fujistu (if you have the $) and maybe the next lower tier:
LG, Philips - over the no name brands you see at the warehouse stores or
Best Buy. But the better and newer plasma offer good black levels, wide
viewing angles, long lifespans, no motion smear (vs LCD) and a stunning
picture which can have this film like look.
My decision, was after a lot of research and many trips to a lot of
stores, was to get a Panasonic 42" plasma. Other people on a tighter
budget, who want a big screen, may go to for DLP or LCD RP TV sets. You
just have to sort through what meets your situation.
Alan F