So my friend wants to trade laptops with me.
He has an asus g72hx rbbx05
(http://reviews.cnet.com/laptops/asus-g72gx-rbbx05-core/4507-3121_7-33938009.html)
I have an acer aspire 5552g-7641
(http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834215037)
I think for pure gaming its worth the trade as my gpu is weaker than his by a good chunk and even though his isnt dx11 mine is too weak to run much dx11 settings anyway. also games are more gpu dependant now than they ever were.
The part where i come to question is on the CPU.
Most games still prefer a high-clocked dual core to a slower quad core and even after having half the cores the dual comes out just a smidge slower than the quad as far as raw computational power goes.
If you look at this chart here (http
/www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Processors-Benchmarklist.2436.0.html) the quad core comes out at 102 where the dual core is 115
Think its worth the trade? both are in good condition as well.
He has an asus g72hx rbbx05
(http://reviews.cnet.com/laptops/asus-g72gx-rbbx05-core/4507-3121_7-33938009.html)
I have an acer aspire 5552g-7641
(http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834215037)
I think for pure gaming its worth the trade as my gpu is weaker than his by a good chunk and even though his isnt dx11 mine is too weak to run much dx11 settings anyway. also games are more gpu dependant now than they ever were.
The part where i come to question is on the CPU.
Most games still prefer a high-clocked dual core to a slower quad core and even after having half the cores the dual comes out just a smidge slower than the quad as far as raw computational power goes.
If you look at this chart here (http

Think its worth the trade? both are in good condition as well.