if sony drops prices of new games by 20-30$ in light of in game advertising, and allows us to buy either a limited time without ads (think 2-5$ for a week), or a full on no adds (an extra 30$) i would have no problem.
i can take an ad if the over all game is cheaper.
however, not middle of action game stopping ad, id say an ad that is there to cover a loading screen would be FAR better than just a load screen for 30 seconds.
and when you go to in game advertisements, like a billboard, a poster, and other crap like that, i also find it VERY acceptable, as it adds realism, and is generally better than a look alike but not really it kind of thing.
what we need to do is make a law that would state the following, you can not sue if anything makes your product look bad, or shows it in a negative light.
there was a movie a long time ago i believe sponsored by pepsi... so all the good guys drank pepsi, and all the commies drank coke. you will never see that today...
back on topic though...
if the price of a game gets reduced substantially i cant take an add
if the add is covering a load screen im also ok with it
if a game costs me 60$ and a patch comes later that adds ads to the game, im likely to go on a murderous rampage.