[citation][nom]AgrovateThem2[/nom]@kristoffenice, lets take what i wrote out of context shall we, the cost to the system of locking up these kids vs the pay off is not worth it, what good would locking up a bunch of kiddies, other then you enjoy paying for these kids meal and boarding through your taxes, and prison is a lottery, kids who go in can easily come out has hardened career criminals. These kids currently are just a marginal hassle to society, not even a threat.what kind of thinking goes along the lines that if there were no hackers Sony would not need to secure my data, nearly always the effects of hacker groups can be negated with enough planning, and i believe your overplaying the effects of hacking, there is a greater risk from phishers and Trojans (perpetrated by a different class of criminals) then from hackersi guess when we locked up all those thieves that theft suddenly stopped huh, reality check, if you want to solve the problem you better go to the root cause rather then the symptomsif Sony were to be found of criminal negligence would you ask that they be thrown into prison too? or would you prefer to be more selective with your definition of criminals[/citation]
Reading both of your posts was a waste of time. Sony should be punished if it is found guilty for neglect.
Want to hear something ironic? It's probably more pointless to argue with you, than pursuing this case, according to you line of reasoning.