These Are the Top 10 Most Fuel Efficient Cars

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Guide community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Is the Toyota IQ/Scion petrol not for sale in US yet?

Think it would come top of this list.

61 mpg (yes American Gallons) highway and 49 mpg urban

Cleverest new car in decades
 
A big LOL at the hybrid fans voting down every post that slightly complains about this list.

Electrical charge must count as a fuel too. Just because the Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner get 34/31 gasoline efficiency, does not make them efficient vehicles!
They are still heavy SUVs and require alot of power to move them. They need to be charged, and electricity costs money.
It is unjust to rank the efficiency of hybrids over gas or diesel cars, without including electrical consumption into the equation.

This list FAILS.
 
@ The guy who said old VW cars are no longer around due to dying. Maybe the rest of the world is different, but where I come from (a University in South Africa) the most common car here is the VW Beetle. The engine was the most simplest engineering, and therefore it works. Less to go wrong, so dont say that VW is crap and they dont last...I myself own a VW Beetle and it just keeps going...but this has nothing to do with its fuel consumption 😉
 
I'm still trying to figure out why the Milan / Fusion pair 41/36 beats both of the Honda's when it appears they get better mileage (40/45, 40/43 respectively) than the Fords.

I'm confused.

I've heard the high mileage diesel reports for years but there is a real prejudice in the US against diesel - stupid, but nevertheless true.

I think we could a long way in both the realms of safety (it's tough to get diesel to openly burn even from a badly leaking tank) and in efficiency by focusing more on diesels.

Today's hybrids really aren't that great a deal. The final result is the need for the disposal of highly toxic chemicals AND the fact that Lithium is only really available in countries that are just as hostile to our future us as the Saudi's - Bolivia (a real close friend of Hugo Chavez) and China.

I'm just thrilled about the possibility that a new silicone-based battery with an enormous charge life that degrades into sand has just been tested by the Israelis. The articles I have read said they believe that it may be able to be made into a large-scale rechargeable power source as well.
 
Too bad you don't actually save any money at all on Hybrids....

Please research the most ECONOMICAL cars and you might be surprised to find 1 hybrid if any...

When those drives break, you must find people with the proper skills to fix them. You won't be pleased.
 
[citation][nom]manwedge[/nom]At 55mph my UK Ford Fiesta Econetic diesel gets nearly 75MPG(US). Last week I managed a 120 mile round trip and got 72MPG. Around town I get about 55MPG. It was quite considerably cheaper than a Prius.Having previously driven a petrol car, I've not noticed much difference. It perhaps doesn't sound as nice pulling away, but after 30mph you don't notice it much.[/citation]

That is the problem with GM and Ford for me! The cars I want to buy from them are European models...
 
[citation][nom]ainarssems[/nom]I get 8mpg, when I push it, 15-16 around the town for short runs and around 30 mpg on the long runs, who gives a shit I have 340 BHP at use[/citation]
Oh you must need that horsepower, to haul heavy loads? no?
oh..you must live some place that has no speed limits? no?
Oh I get it, you have a small penis?
 
The problem with people claiming that for longer trips, you are better off without the batteries on hybrids is misguided... Sure if the entire trip was on a flat or downhill. For the real world, you are generally better off (higher MPG) with batteries because hybrids can capture energy from downhills to offset energy required to climb uphills.
 
I have a Honda Civic Hybrid and love the smooth quiet ride due to CVT transmission/electric/small engine. No more jerkiness from gear shifting!

Also I consistently beat EPA highway numbers (coasting and less aggressive driving, 50+ mph going 65mph or 60+ mph going 55mph). City too but haven't beaten it by as much as high way numbers.
 
[citation][nom]kingtoid[/nom]I agree. Smog is bad in California but in SoCal (except for like San Diego) it is just ridiculous. Where I live is bad but LA is often worse. Sometimes when I go there it is painful to breathe.I have often hypothesized that everyone in LA, single commuter traffic that is, should just ride motorcycles. Sure it would be like several Asian countries, but at least it would reduce smog/congestion and people would shut up about MPG and all that other crap.I am still annoyed how they sell newer cars like they get better gas mileage than older "clunkers" when really they are far worse. It is all about emissions. My grandpa has always bought the 3/4 or 1 ton Dodge trucks, with good reason. He has been buying the diesel ones since they first started coming out in the late 80's. He had one of the 24 valve 5.9L Cummins motors in a mid 90's truck and it got 20MPG consistently. His new truck which is basically identical except that it is red and not a dually gets only 15MPG if he is very careful driving it. I don't understand why the government and the manufacturers can not realize the great potential in big power and adequate gearing. STS turbo got a brand new corvette. Put on a twin turbo kit, nothing wild, just a mild tune, stock bottom end, motor, and what not. And then they drove it on the freeway and averaged 40MPG. Cars are starting to improve but there is no sense in having an Overdrive gear (or 2[or 3; yes I am talking to you BMW, Mercedes, Bugatti, and the like of you]) if your engine is not powerful enough to use it.And just to screw with all of you I would like to inform you all that there are still a large number of people that drive Challengers from the 1970's with the 426 HEMI motors and the real low rear gears that average 8MPG. 8. Just consider that. I would say that we have improved at least a small bit since then. Just saying.And yeah that is kind of funny about the lead acid batteries and how we can completely recycle and reuse every single component (lead and acid included). And then we can't seem to fix the air quality. I will say that it is not entirely man's fault. In big cities it is, but not everywhere else.[/citation]

thats not what I am complaining about, I am complaining about the expensive battery. lithium ion batteries only last a few years

when the battery wears out and doesn't hold a charge anymore, there very expensive to replace

also when a battery is completely worn out, they become a energy black hole, for example get a laptop with a completely worn out battery, and using a program like everest look at the power monitor
you will see that the charge rate is constantly on, giving power constantly to a battery that looses power just as fast as you charge it. in a car that means a higher engine load at all time because the engine has to run at a higher RPM to generate power to charge the battery that will never finish charging.

in other words crappy gas mileage, wort than a all gas engine car.

also people who buy the own their own car generally want to keep their car longer than they keep their ipod. (also after about 6 months to a year, the battery in the hybrid has already lost a good amount of it's charging capacity, this is how the batteries are, they loos a ton of mAh then level off slightly for a while then crash at a very low capacity where the cells are too worn to hold a charge for what little mAh it has and becomes a black hole for energy
 
sry I meant to quote the message above you, too used to having the quote button in the lower right hand side because like 99% of message boards have it there
 
[citation][nom]nachowarrior[/nom]my bike-cycle gets infinite miles to the gallon...[/citation]
Actually, the rating of your bike would most likely be "E". The calculation is infinity milleage divided by zero gallons, thus ∞/0= Error.
 
As someone else mentioned, where are the TDI's.

My TDI is getting me around the mid 30's in mileage, and still has the power to fly off the start when required.
A feature most of these hybrids are certainly lacking, add to that the fact that the hybrids cost on average $5,000 more.

The marketing in north america is horribly biased towards hybrid vehicles, citing them as the only solution for fuel efficiency.
Fuel efficiency we're apparantly supposed to pay through the nose for, why spend $5,000 more on a hybrid version of a car when I can get something like a TDI which costs only $1,000 more than the standard gas model?

In an economy in the state ours is currently in, hybrids really don't make sense for the average consumer.
 
it will probably take you like 50 years for the gas savings to outweigh the higher cost of a hybrid car, the battery will fail and require a expensive replacement long before you get any real savings.
 
Diesel is not considered clean fuel by 1/3 of the states. ie: cali.
& yes the Diesel cars are defiantly clean, its just Cali is broke & cant afford the tools to test Diesel cars to prove/disprove their clean ways (Diesel trucks pump out lots of toxic greenhouse gasses). Thus these cars will not get special Tax credit from the government & wont get acknowledged on fuel efficient American sites.

OH & most diesel cars are not American made soo why would our Government want to prove foreign cars are cleaner than theirs? especially during Bankruptcy? We need to sell more AMERICAN CARS GO GO HYBRIDS! Japan is being smart 😉
 
HAHA well volkswagen didn't make it on the list because it's Das Crap! I stand by my words (which obviously isn't very popular) that the VWs you drive here in North America are not of the same, real German quality which our European friends are driving. The truth hurts, I know.
 
Yes I can't work out why only hybrids. Even our Honda Jazz frequently returns over 60 mpg (US 50 mpg) around town. Its very surprising how much gear can be put in a Jazz (its like a tardis).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.