Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (
More info?)
On 2005-05-19, Randy S. <rswitt@nospamgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Why not? If there is an exception, it should be mentioned (which I
>>>>originally neglected in my hasty response.)
>>>
>>>Why not? Because it's misleading. I don't see you posting that
>>>only certain people are born with 10 fingers, do I? No, I don't,
>>>because we're not here to mislead each other, or the new people.
>>>
>>
>>
>> So when the OP comes back and says, I bought a series 1 and you guys
>> lied about it being able to record without service, you can
>> apologize. When it comes to spending money the consumer should be as
>> informed as possible in order to make an intelligent decison.
>>
>> How giving more correct information is misleading is beyond me.
>>
>
> I think he's saying that "only" implies that a minority of Series 1
> boxes did it. Perhaps "most, but not all" would have been more
> accurate. However, it's a pretty minor nit.
If a user is getting a TiVo with the intended purpose of using it without
service (the OP's actual interest), then this issue is the #1 priority and
is _very_ important for the user to look into - regardless of what the
actual percentage is of S1s that can work without a service. I think the
emphasis of using "only" is ok to draw attention to this escape given it
is the so important in the decision making process.
--
This is my .sig