Toyota Creating Anti-Drunk Driving Device

Status
Not open for further replies.

chaohsiangchen

Distinguished
Jul 28, 2008
130
0
18,630
Good development. They need to develop devices to detect driver's condition, and, if necessary, stop the car and call 911 for assistance. Given the aging population in Japan, Europe and US/Canada, more people will need this kind of protection. Imaging driving at high speed when getting a heart attack, a stroke or loss of conscious due to low blood pressure. That's terrible, but I believe technology can make it preventable.
 

ssalim

Distinguished
Sep 29, 2007
383
0
18,930
I'm more worried about being hit by a teen driving while texting.
Can they make a thing that emits EMP every x seconds while also shielding the car? heh.
 

ukgooey

Distinguished
Apr 25, 2009
57
0
18,580
What about making BMW drivers retake their driving tests annually? That would make the roads a safer place and save many more lives. And there would be no need for this costly development! The simplest solutions are always the best :)
 

ssalim

Distinguished
Sep 29, 2007
383
0
18,930
No, IQ has nothing to do with stupidity or carelessness.
I can be the smartest guy in the universe but I can be careless and drive while drunk or texting.

Retake driving test annually? it's a hassle unless it's a law -- and why only BMW drivers?
 

IzzyCraft

Distinguished
Nov 20, 2008
218
0
18,830
[citation][nom]ssalim[/nom]I'm more worried about being hit by a teen driving while texting.Can they make a thing that emits EMP every x seconds while also shielding the car? heh.[/citation]
Too bad cellphone jammers are illegal in the US else I'd put a really short range one in every teenagers car.
 

steiner666

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
117
0
18,630
ok, so this technology is based under the assumption that the person who breathes into the device will be the one driving... yeah, theres no way around that....
 

Kaiser_25

Distinguished
Jul 9, 2009
90
0
18,580
I think that cell phones are on par with the dangers of drunk driving...think how many times have you seen a car drifting or swerving only to see its someone on a cell, or texting etc. its bad!!
 

Greg_77

Distinguished
Nov 11, 2008
103
0
18,630
[citation][nom]ukgooey[/nom]What about making BMW drivers retake their driving tests annually? That would make the roads a safer place and save many more lives. And there would be no need for this costly development! The simplest solutions are always the best[/citation]

Little jealous of BMW owners, eh?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Everyone get your car loaded with some breath loaded fartbags!
You know, where ever there's a lock, there's a way to circumvent it.
Will this become the new DRM for driving?
 
G

Guest

Guest
Driving while old is worse than driving while drunk. I'll be sober tomorrow, but grandpa will still be swerving all over the place. It also may be considered sexist to say that women can't drive, but I've honestly never met one that could :D
 

ravenware

Distinguished
May 17, 2005
156
0
18,630
?
This seems kinda silly. Treating grown people like children, it is ridiculous. If this becomes popular enough and installed into newer vehicles people aren't going to respond well at all; they're just going to disable the systems or boycott the manufacturers.

Its one thing the actually protect people it quite another to treat people like babies and make them feel like they're guilty until proven innocent.
 

laweinhander

Distinguished
May 3, 2009
3
0
18,510
Why does everyone always say they are worried about teenagers texting and driving? ... Are 40 year olds better at texting and driving then teenagers, or am i missing something?
 

njalterio

Distinguished
Jan 14, 2008
153
0
18,630
[citation] According to Toyota, the company has installed the new system on selected trucks and other vehicles, and will begin testing tomorrow, September 1; the test will conclude on November 30.[/citation]

Sounds like a fun three months of work for someone! Paid for drinking on the job....
 

tanderskey

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2009
45
0
18,580
[citation][nom]steiner666[/nom]ok, so this technology is based under the assumption that the person who breathes into the device will be the one driving... yeah, theres no way around that....[/citation]

well the article did say "The system comprises of a hand-held unit that provides a breathalyzer and a digital camera to identify the driver's face." so that camera's photo may be helpful while reviewing an accident or driving offense later. or perhaps photo recognition tech will be the next layer.

of course, creative people eventually find ways around these things. perhaps someone else will come up with a "charcoal filter" of some sort to clean one's breath in the event they have one of these doo-dads gripped to their Toyota's ignition?

... but also agreeing with derek2006 that maybe heavy drinkers with bad judgment will buy other cars (which might result in Toyota owners awarded cheaper insurance).
 

amnotanoobie

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2006
134
0
18,640
If they could skip the hand-held breathalyzer and make it check the air around instead, I could see this working. Damn them if I need to get my breathalyzer every time if I need to get to work or buy something at the grocery.
 

fuser

Distinguished
Aug 4, 2008
115
0
18,630
[citation][nom]ravenware[/nom]?This seems kinda silly. Treating grown people like children, it is ridiculous. If this becomes popular enough and installed into newer vehicles people aren't going to respond well at all; they're just going to disable the systems or boycott the manufacturers. Its one thing the actually protect people it quite another to treat people like babies and make them feel like they're guilty until proven innocent.[/citation]
The big problem is that most people are idiots. Tens of thousands of people are killed by drunk drivers in the United States every year. Adults have shown time and time again that they're not capable of making rational decisions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.