G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
In article <N4ednbfbw4Ml-R3dRVn-ig@lmi.net>,
Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>Alan M. <letsgohokies@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Apparently Verizon and T-Mobile have such an agreement, as do Verizon and
>> Cingular. Interesting that Verizon and Verizon Wireless do not.
>
>Yup. And SBC and Sprint PCS also had such an agreement so that Sprint cell
>subscribers' names showed up on SBC landline caller ID, but that ended when
>they got into a fight about compensation for the database dips...
A bit of detail here... In the landline network, the caller-id number
info comes along with the rest of the call setup info, but the name is
NOT included. The end switch has to make a separate database "dip" in
the caller's database to map the number to a name in order to send it
to the called phone, and contracts specifying the cost/dip have to be
in place. For whatever reason, most wireless providers don't provide
that database to the landline carrier. In the "old days", wireless
providers had a much more primitive connection to the landline system
(sort of like a super PBX rather than a peer phone company), but that
excuse doesn't apply anymore.
Similar contracts would have to be in place for landline->wireless calls,
but I am not sure if the protocol to the wireless phone supports caller
id name.
In article <N4ednbfbw4Ml-R3dRVn-ig@lmi.net>,
Steven J Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote:
>Alan M. <letsgohokies@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Apparently Verizon and T-Mobile have such an agreement, as do Verizon and
>> Cingular. Interesting that Verizon and Verizon Wireless do not.
>
>Yup. And SBC and Sprint PCS also had such an agreement so that Sprint cell
>subscribers' names showed up on SBC landline caller ID, but that ended when
>they got into a fight about compensation for the database dips...
A bit of detail here... In the landline network, the caller-id number
info comes along with the rest of the call setup info, but the name is
NOT included. The end switch has to make a separate database "dip" in
the caller's database to map the number to a name in order to send it
to the called phone, and contracts specifying the cost/dip have to be
in place. For whatever reason, most wireless providers don't provide
that database to the landline carrier. In the "old days", wireless
providers had a much more primitive connection to the landline system
(sort of like a super PBX rather than a peer phone company), but that
excuse doesn't apply anymore.
Similar contracts would have to be in place for landline->wireless calls,
but I am not sure if the protocol to the wireless phone supports caller
id name.