[citation][nom]njalterio[/nom]The Xbox 360 is just a total flop: High failure rate, no unique and worthwhile games, graphics are terrible compared to what's available on a PC.[/citation]
Hard to call the second most successful console of this generation a flop, regardless of its problems. In fact, I wouldn't really call even the PS3 a flop despite it having the lowest sales of the big three. They're all selling well, and they'd only be a flop if they didn't. You can have a great product, but it'll be a flop if the sales fall through.
[citation][nom]False_Dmitry_II[/nom]The simple fact is, that it should not even count as a console. Not when what you say is that it isn't trying to go against the PS3 or 360. It simply isn't the same kind of thing. You don't compare motorcycles to cars and claim one as best. It's a toy for non-gamers. [/citation]
Well, let me check my identification guide:
1) Plays video games? Check and double-check.
2) Backwards-compatible with almost all the previous Nintendo consoles? Check.
3) Compatible with a lot of their competitors' consoles? Wow, check there too!
2) PC? Nope.
3) Media player? Barely.
Looks like a console to me.

In fact I'd say it's more of a video game console than any of the others if push came to shove: it not only plays its own big library of videogames, it also plays games from Nintendo's biggest selling machines in the past, AND games for other systems like the Genesis, TurboGrafx 16, even computer games from the Commodore 64. It won't play your HD-DVDs or Blu-Ray movies, but since when does that determine whether something's a video game console or not?