A simple word search tells me that the laptop in question is the Satellite L750/0CN.
This machine is not even in the same league as an $800 laptop. This is a high-end, performance notebook (albeit not necessarily a
gaming notebook). This is a laptop that costs well over a thousand dollars. Like I said, the processor is bad to the bone.
This laptop is excellent.
http/www.noelleeming.co.nz/shop/computers/notebook-computers/pc-notebook-computers/toshiba-l750-0cn-15-6-notebook/prod115173.html
The laptop's
gaming performance or the laptop's
general performance? If it's the latter, I don't even think it's up for debate. The 2670qm beats out even the 2630qm, which happens to be the same processor in the one of the most powerful notebooks ever, the Alienware M18x. Even it's 4GB of RAM is 1333MHz, whereas most modern notebooks use 1066MHz DDR3. This notebook rocks.
citation needed
It's my opinion that websites like that are generally pretty conservative when making claims.
How's this for general performance?
http/www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNMB0xSahI8&feature=related
Not only is this user running Crysis 2 on high in 1360x768 and getting good performance, but is doing it with a CPU that isn't even in the same league as the 2670qm.
Here is a user playing BF3 on high in 1360x768, although there's lag, mainly due to fraps.
http/www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQO8D0moap4
Here's a user running BF3 in medium settings and getting great performance.
http/www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExKZT6KfThA
In both BF3 videos, the CPU doesn't come close to the 2670qm.
Here is someone playing Crysis almost maxed out.
http/www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu7pVOrnf2Q
Again, with a far weaker CPU.
There are tons of people on youtube running modern games (even demanding ones), and doing so with decent visual settings and good performance. And considering that 1360x768 is the native resolution of that laptop, playing games in 1360x768 will look acceptable and feel natural.
Entertaining and not frustrating?
I would say so.