[citation][nom]dxwarlock[/nom]So that means its doing well? because they are selling them preinstalled with 8? Every HP now is windows 8, windows 7 is not an option. And 2 family members got new PC's since then (i know, they got an HP..bad idea) but besides that. First thing they did was call me, ask me what was up with windows..and they was lost. And if I had their 'old' windows version to put back on. In the IT world, EVERY SINGLE network admin I have to work with remotely, of course windows 8 and server 2012 come up asking if I like it, and if we plan on supporting it with our software out of curiosity. But not because they plan on using it, one of them are going to touch it with a 10 foot pole themselves.More out of asking us if we are wasting time on developing for it.And the commercial market dictates to a great extent an OS's success. If big companies like USA Today, Wall street Journal, Times Inc etc. aren't going to install it on one single PC in the building, or put 2012 on one single server they own..thats a bad indication other businesses like it have the same mentality.I think you are confusing 'analysts must be idiots' with "I like it myself, and my vast sampling group of my 2 parents do too..so its doing fine..i think they are idiots"[/citation]
But I think that is exactly the problem. In your examples, everyone is avoiding 8 simply because they have no desire to try to learn something only slightly new, or have been scared off by the bad press. Whether Win 8 fails or not is not as important as the reason why it fails. If it fails because it is legitimately not at least as good as 7 after taking everything into account, then that's fine - it would be the same as those who stuck with Vista despite its rough start and negative image. But if it fails because people were simply scared off over relatively trite matters and a very loud chorus of negativity that is at least overblown if not misplaced, then that doesn't help anyone.