[citation][nom]bhaberle[/nom]I totally agree that there is not nearly the same incentive. But when someone like robertking82881 says comments like that, I believe my response is legitimate. Especially when other people have a larger population than us, and we get so many products from other countries.Plus it is good for everyone to know another language since it allows for different ways of thinking and cultural understanding. Although I am not one to talk since I am not fully bilingual in any of the 3 languages I studied. =P[/citation]
i have to disagree. at the very least the chinese language as a whole, needs a revamp, and the old 20000 character literacy version needs to die.
when you speak their languages, you know what they mean through context, well, why cant the written language be that way to?
look ill use japan as an example. they have a 800 character literacy, 1200 highschool and 1600 collage. they have a different form of the language that uses 78 characters, and is more context based, and is used above kanji to tell you pronunciation. kanji itself takes any doubt about the context away, only if you know the kanji. now that 78 character alphabet is more or less the same as our extended alphabet, but here is the thing, every character can be romanised, and it turns into a 2 or 3 letter sound.
if they phased out traditional symbols and phased in a romanised version of the language, it would be beneficial to everyone, but recently china banned english, i believe just from tv, but maybe just from news, and in general how xenophobic asian countries are, i doubt this will ever happen.