"300 dpi" speech's : the greatest bluff

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
industry.

The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
"300 dpi" had made confusion..

What do you think about this?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

What is your point ?

--


Cheers _ Hunibal _
"germano" <germano.colla@libero.it> wrote in message
news:3449482c.0411281515.327aa81e@posting.google.com...
>I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> industry.
>
> The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> "300 dpi" had made confusion..
>
> What do you think about this?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"germano" <germano.colla@libero.it> wrote in message
news:3449482c.0411281515.327aa81e@posting.google.com...
> I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> industry.
>
> The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> "300 dpi" had made confusion..
>
> What do you think about this?

Please read back over what you wrote, and then decide if you can decipher
it...

....We can't either.

Perhaps a re-write is in order.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

"germano" <germano.colla@libero.it> wrote in message
news:3449482c.0411281515.327aa81e@posting.google.com...
>I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> industry.
>
> The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> "300 dpi" had made confusion..
>
> What do you think about this?

huh?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

germano.colla@libero.it (germano) wrote in
news:3449482c.0411281515.327aa81e@posting.google.com:

> I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> industry.
>
> The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> "300 dpi" had made confusion..
>
> What do you think about this?

Well, I'll grant you sound very confused. English difficulties, perhaps.
Would you care to try re-phrasing this?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

germano wrote:
> I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> industry.
>
> The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> "300 dpi" had made confusion..
>
> What do you think about this?

Please see my answer to your previous post.

David

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

germano wrote:

> I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> industry.
>
> The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> "300 dpi" had made confusion..
>
> What do you think about this?

No confusion at all. lp/mm refers to the image as produced in the camera,
and is a measure of optical and sensor systems in the camera. 300 dpi
refers to the printing process, and is a measure of the potential
sharpness of the print.

Colin

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Colin D <ColinD@killspam.127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<41AA9DE1.9AC1DD64@killspam.127.0.0.1>...
> germano wrote:
>
> > I think "300 Dpi" speeech's are the greatest bluff made in digital's
> > industry.
> >
> > The only one to compare resolution are lpmm sistem,but the great bluff
> > "300 dpi" had made confusion..
> >
> > What do you think about this?
>
> No confusion at all. lp/mm refers to the image as produced in the camera,
> and is a measure of optical and sensor systems in the camera. 300 dpi
> refers to the printing process, and is a measure of the potential
> sharpness of the print.
>
> Colin
Further complicating this is the fact that printer dots are not the
same as pixels (why I prefer the terminology "pixels per inch" when
talking about resolution). And, of course, a line pair (lp) has two
pixels or thereabouts.

Don