Archived from groups: alt.video.ptv.tivo (
More info?)
In article <Xns96917E69D4ED2Louiscypherhellorg@140.99.99.130>, SINNER
<arcade.master@googlemail.net> wrote:
> * Ken Alverson Wrote in alt.video.ptv.tivo:
>
> > "SINNER" <arcade.master@googlemail.net> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9691728ECCAC5Louiscypherhellorg@140.99.99.130...
> >>
http/news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=638&e=3&u=/nm/20050712/e
> >> n_nm/media_dvr_dc
> >
> > Of course they do. Because most commercials are boring, and we've
> > seen the same commercials over and over again...I wouldn't watch a
> > show 30 times, why would I want to watch an advertisement that
> > often?
> >
> > For what it's worth, if a commercial looks interesting and I
> > haven't already seen it, I'll watch at least part of it. If it's
> > good, I'll even watch the whole thing.
> >
>
> Indeed, I have been known to rewind and watch a commercial I like
> several times and if I notice it while FF'ing through I stop and
> watch it again. Why dont the advertisers get it?
I think it's because they don't want to. They believe that one of the
things that sells products is endless repetition of commercials,
particularly annoying ones. The commercials that catch people like us
have to be far better than average, and they can't be annoying. We're
the ones with the power.
Like most here, I routinely 30 -> past commercial blocks, but sometimes
I'll catch a flash of something interesting in that brief time between
blips, and I'll go back and watch attentively. This should be what
advertisers want, and it probably is, but it's not what their agencies
want.