Having recently been through two laptop purchasing fiascos, I'm looking into building my own. Has THG reviewed the current barebones laptop offerings from Asus, Msi, VBI, and Compal (yes, Compal, not Compaq)?
I'm looking at 8 barebones models and another Acer. I have them all spec'd the same, except for the Acer, which is a factory system. I'm looking for feedback from people who have built their own laptops from barebones or have custom laptops built on these platforms:
Asus z92m
Compal HEL81 Special edition (nvidia G73mv integrated video)
Intel - VBI S96J
MSI 16323
MSI 171881
MSI 1039-B006US
MSI 1039-B005US
MSI 1029
I spec'd them all with their respective 1.6GHz CPUs: Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Turion MT, and Turion X2. All of them are also spec'd with 1bg RAM, some are DDR some are DDR2. Cost for the processors and RAM are all faily equal - the processors are all about $200 and RAM is about $100.
Purchasing Fiasco
In early December, I purchased an Acer Aspire 5102 from walmart for $749. Don't laugh, their 2-year 'drop it off the table and pour juice in it' warranty is $68. Every shop sends them back to the factory for repairs anyway, so what does it matter where you buy it?
Anyway, the Acer had ATI x1100 video, and SiSoft Sandra and Dxdiag both listed it as PCI bus, not PCIe, so I returned it. I picked up an HP 6113z with nVidia G0 6100 video as a replacement. What a mistake.
Both laptops had AMD Turion 64 TL50 processors and 1GB of RAM. The Acer was Ati chipped (video and chipset) and the HP was nvidia chipped (video and chipset). Just as a point of reference, my desktop is an Athlon 3200+ XP (barton core) with 2GB of DDR400 on an nForce 2 motherboard- pretty much top of the line as far as 32bit desktops go (core duo aside).
The Acer's factory software load was just Windows MCE and Norton Internet Security Suite. This thing was FAST. For those of you who have ATI video cards, you are familiar with how slow the Catalyst Control Center loads. On my desktop, it takes almost 25 seconds to load. On the Acer it loaded instantly. Even Windows was fast. Everyting responded instantly, even opening My Computer and Network Neighborhood.
The HP's factory software load was ghastly. There's no other way to describe it. It took me over an hour to clean out all the demos, trialware, games, and utilities. It was also incredibly slow - nearly as slow as my desktop. Windows lagged and lurched, there were delays opening nearly everything, including the SATA hard drive (the Acer's was IDE). It was so slow compared to the Acer that I emailed tech support in a desperate attempt to speed it up.
Three days, 14 (printed) pages of email, and a phone call later, HP informed me that they didn't sell 'clean' copies of Windows, and flat out refused to do anything about the poor performance. She (the customer service rep) said that if I was that dissatisfied with the laptop, then I should just return it. I did.
So now I'm back in the market for a laptop.
My only gripe witht the Acer was the video, so I may pick up another one if the barebones thing doesn't work out.
I'm looking at 8 barebones models and another Acer. I have them all spec'd the same, except for the Acer, which is a factory system. I'm looking for feedback from people who have built their own laptops from barebones or have custom laptops built on these platforms:
Asus z92m
Compal HEL81 Special edition (nvidia G73mv integrated video)
Intel - VBI S96J
MSI 16323
MSI 171881
MSI 1039-B006US
MSI 1039-B005US
MSI 1029
I spec'd them all with their respective 1.6GHz CPUs: Core Duo, Core 2 Duo, Turion MT, and Turion X2. All of them are also spec'd with 1bg RAM, some are DDR some are DDR2. Cost for the processors and RAM are all faily equal - the processors are all about $200 and RAM is about $100.
Purchasing Fiasco
In early December, I purchased an Acer Aspire 5102 from walmart for $749. Don't laugh, their 2-year 'drop it off the table and pour juice in it' warranty is $68. Every shop sends them back to the factory for repairs anyway, so what does it matter where you buy it?
Anyway, the Acer had ATI x1100 video, and SiSoft Sandra and Dxdiag both listed it as PCI bus, not PCIe, so I returned it. I picked up an HP 6113z with nVidia G0 6100 video as a replacement. What a mistake.
Both laptops had AMD Turion 64 TL50 processors and 1GB of RAM. The Acer was Ati chipped (video and chipset) and the HP was nvidia chipped (video and chipset). Just as a point of reference, my desktop is an Athlon 3200+ XP (barton core) with 2GB of DDR400 on an nForce 2 motherboard- pretty much top of the line as far as 32bit desktops go (core duo aside).
The Acer's factory software load was just Windows MCE and Norton Internet Security Suite. This thing was FAST. For those of you who have ATI video cards, you are familiar with how slow the Catalyst Control Center loads. On my desktop, it takes almost 25 seconds to load. On the Acer it loaded instantly. Even Windows was fast. Everyting responded instantly, even opening My Computer and Network Neighborhood.
The HP's factory software load was ghastly. There's no other way to describe it. It took me over an hour to clean out all the demos, trialware, games, and utilities. It was also incredibly slow - nearly as slow as my desktop. Windows lagged and lurched, there were delays opening nearly everything, including the SATA hard drive (the Acer's was IDE). It was so slow compared to the Acer that I emailed tech support in a desperate attempt to speed it up.
Three days, 14 (printed) pages of email, and a phone call later, HP informed me that they didn't sell 'clean' copies of Windows, and flat out refused to do anything about the poor performance. She (the customer service rep) said that if I was that dissatisfied with the laptop, then I should just return it. I did.
So now I'm back in the market for a laptop.
My only gripe witht the Acer was the video, so I may pick up another one if the barebones thing doesn't work out.