Boo hoo. We bought records/CDs because they were the highest quality, back then. MP3's don't skip when you're driving down the road with a perfectly clean disc in the player.
Sure looking at art work is cool if it's any good (which was 1 out of 10 albums at best). What these entertainers/record industry don't want to acknowledge is that the vast majority of the people who buy their albums have a lot less money than they do, even/especially now. With the pace of life and all the necessary expenses we have these days, we'd rather not blindly fork over $10-20 to "get lost in the magic" of an album, trying to convince ourselves that the even the crappy ones were worth it. Basically he and other musicians are just whining about the fact the consumer has more resources available these days to make more informed decisions. If they were smart they'd also realize how much potential the internet/DD has for their careers too if it's used to their advantage. But they're stuck in the past way of thinking.
PS, I love the South Park episode about this issue.
Sure looking at art work is cool if it's any good (which was 1 out of 10 albums at best). What these entertainers/record industry don't want to acknowledge is that the vast majority of the people who buy their albums have a lot less money than they do, even/especially now. With the pace of life and all the necessary expenses we have these days, we'd rather not blindly fork over $10-20 to "get lost in the magic" of an album, trying to convince ourselves that the even the crappy ones were worth it. Basically he and other musicians are just whining about the fact the consumer has more resources available these days to make more informed decisions. If they were smart they'd also realize how much potential the internet/DD has for their careers too if it's used to their advantage. But they're stuck in the past way of thinking.
PS, I love the South Park episode about this issue.